2005
DOI: 10.3138/cjpe.020.005
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The Delphi Technique as a Method for Increasing Inclusion in the Evaluation Process

Abstract: The question of how best to integrate the views of underrepresented and marginalized groups in the evaluation process is of critical importance to many evaluation theorists and practitioners. In this article the Delphi technique, a method used to achieve consensus on a set of issues with the participation of all interested parties without incident or confrontation that could compromise the validity of collected data, is offered as a procedure for enhancing marginalized group participation in the evaluation pro… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
16
0
1

Year Published

2007
2007
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
3
1

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 53 publications
(17 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
16
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Rounds 2 and 3 responses were imported into SPSS Statistics software for analysis. To assess whether the panel reached consensus on an item, the researchers adhered to Christie and Barela's (2005) recommendations, with consensus achieved when 75% of responses fell within two points of the item's mean score. Upon analyzing Round 2 data, the researchers redistributed items that did not achieve consensus to the panel through the Round 3 questionnaire.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Rounds 2 and 3 responses were imported into SPSS Statistics software for analysis. To assess whether the panel reached consensus on an item, the researchers adhered to Christie and Barela's (2005) recommendations, with consensus achieved when 75% of responses fell within two points of the item's mean score. Upon analyzing Round 2 data, the researchers redistributed items that did not achieve consensus to the panel through the Round 3 questionnaire.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, different analyses are suggested to decide whether rounds are complete or a new Delphi round is needed. Since a seven-point Likert scale was used in the study, the difference between quartiles for consensus should be less than 1.5 (Christie & Barela, 2005). Seventeen experts were given 2 weeks to review the RPV-OLC and were briefed on the Delphi panels' planning.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Based on this, S.D . ≤ 1 is used as a cut-off point based on the 5-point Likert scale as it represents the high level of interexpert consensus (Christie & Barela, 2005). Another judgment of interexpert consensus is determined if the items are rated with a median value of ≥4.0 (Foster et al, 2009).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%