2021
DOI: 10.1080/10841806.2021.1984102
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The delusion of privilege

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
3

Relationship

0
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 20 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This section establishes our claim that excluding a few articles (Gooden 2015a; Gooden, 2017; Williams, 1947), social equity scholarship has published limited historical analyses of pre-1968 periods (Gooden, 2017; Johnson & Svara, 2011; Moloney et al, 2023; Trochmann et al, 2022). It is a concept with still-nascent understandings about Whiteness at its Minnowbrook “origin” (for a start, see Crenshaw, 1989; Diggs, 2022; Heckler, 2017; Hooks, 1981; Moloney & Lewis, 2023; Portillo et al, 2022). In contrast, our paper's use of racial contract theory helps place history, Whiteness, and the “who” can speak at its center.…”
Section: The Ahistorical Whiteness Of the Social Equity Concept “Orig...mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This section establishes our claim that excluding a few articles (Gooden 2015a; Gooden, 2017; Williams, 1947), social equity scholarship has published limited historical analyses of pre-1968 periods (Gooden, 2017; Johnson & Svara, 2011; Moloney et al, 2023; Trochmann et al, 2022). It is a concept with still-nascent understandings about Whiteness at its Minnowbrook “origin” (for a start, see Crenshaw, 1989; Diggs, 2022; Heckler, 2017; Hooks, 1981; Moloney & Lewis, 2023; Portillo et al, 2022). In contrast, our paper's use of racial contract theory helps place history, Whiteness, and the “who” can speak at its center.…”
Section: The Ahistorical Whiteness Of the Social Equity Concept “Orig...mentioning
confidence: 99%