1997
DOI: 10.1002/(sici)1099-1255(199709/10)12:5<509::aid-jae451>3.3.co;2-g
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The demand for food in the United States and The Netherlands: a systems approach with the CBS model

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
13
0
1

Year Published

2003
2003
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
5
2

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(14 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
13
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…It is a consistent empirical result that the demand for food is relatively unresponsive to price. For a recent estimate confirming this fact in the United States, see van Driel, et al (1997). Given this fact, if the price of high quality food rises in the winter, then expenditures should also increase.…”
Section: Alternative Explanations For Our Findingsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It is a consistent empirical result that the demand for food is relatively unresponsive to price. For a recent estimate confirming this fact in the United States, see van Driel, et al (1997). Given this fact, if the price of high quality food rises in the winter, then expenditures should also increase.…”
Section: Alternative Explanations For Our Findingsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The existing empirical evidence finds that the demand for agricultural goods is indeed price inelastic. Studies typically estimate the price elasticity of food demand to be between −0.80 and −0.20 (e.g., Tobin, 1950;Tolley et al, 1969;Van Driel et al, 1997). We therefore take the case in which an increase in agricultural productivity A A decreases the value of land to be the empirically relevant scenario.…”
Section: Battles 1800smentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Studies typically estimate the price elasticity of food demand to be between −0.80 and −0.20 (e.g.,Tobin, 1950;Tolley et al, 1969;Van Driel et al, 1997).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Studies typically estimate the price elasticity of food demand to be between −0.80 and −0.20 (e.g., Tobin, 1950;Tolley et al, 1969;Van Driel et al, 1997). We therefore take the case in which an increase in agricultural productivity A A decreases the value of land to be the empirically relevant scenario.…”
Section: Battles 1800smentioning
confidence: 99%