1971
DOI: 10.2307/1925374
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The Demand for Housing: A Review of Cross-Section Evidence

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
39
1
2

Year Published

1973
1973
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
7
2

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 219 publications
(43 citation statements)
references
References 3 publications
1
39
1
2
Order By: Relevance
“…Standard errors are shown in parentheses. (3) . Because the dependent variable is the log of house value or rent, these coefficients should· not be interpreted directly.…”
Section: Other Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Standard errors are shown in parentheses. (3) . Because the dependent variable is the log of house value or rent, these coefficients should· not be interpreted directly.…”
Section: Other Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, later work which tried to use permanent income, or proxies for it, rather than measured income, found much higher elasticities. Most recently de Leeuw (3) adjusted cross-section estimates by Muth (10), Reid (11), and Winger (13) and offered new estimates of his own. His range of estimates for all these authors is 0.8 to 1.0 for renters, and 1.25 to 1.46 for owners.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This is particularly true when the CI is for elasticities (that is, the percentage change in Y for each 1% change in X). An example can be found in de Leeuw (1971) from the labor economics literature.…”
Section: Binary Xmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Household incomes are cited in the classical economic literature as one of the main factors that determine the demand for housing (Norton, 1955;Friedman, 1957;De Leeuw, 1971;and Poterba, 1984, among others). Households consume housing services subject to the limitations imposed by their income and the cost of housing; this logical approach was proposed by Muth (1969) who also put forward the "permanent income" hypothesis.…”
Section: Housing Financing and Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%