2021
DOI: 10.1016/j.jacceco.2021.101417
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The demand for public information by local and nonlocal investors: Evidence from investor-level data

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
6
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 22 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 35 publications
1
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Business ties and board connections between investors and firms affect voting behavior (Davis and Kim, 2007;Cvijanovic et al, 2016;Calluzzo and Kedia, 2019;Duan et al, 2021). These connections are more common when the investor and the firm are located in the same country, which could potentially explain the home bias in voting found in Section 4.…”
Section: Business Tiesmentioning
confidence: 95%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Business ties and board connections between investors and firms affect voting behavior (Davis and Kim, 2007;Cvijanovic et al, 2016;Calluzzo and Kedia, 2019;Duan et al, 2021). These connections are more common when the investor and the firm are located in the same country, which could potentially explain the home bias in voting found in Section 4.…”
Section: Business Tiesmentioning
confidence: 95%
“…Common language, similar culture, and short distance could all contribute to familiarity bias (Grinblatt and Keloharju, 2001). Salience bias has also been proposed as a possible explanation for home bias (Dyer, 2021). Investors receive more exposure to local news media of local firms, which naturally leads to increased salience.…”
Section: Home Biasmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Previous studies suggest that local shareholders are informed and better at monitoring proximate firms since their cost of acquiring monitoring information is low relative to distant shareholders (Ayers et al, 2011;Dyer, 2021;Dyer et al, 2021). Chhaochharia et al (2012) also find that firms with high local ownership have better internal governance and are more profitable.…”
Section: Local Ownership and Firm Performancementioning
confidence: 99%
“…We believe this argument is unlikely to hold for two reasons. First, instead of forecasts eroding a local investor's information advantage, there is some evidence that local investors extend their information advantage through their use of public information (Dyer 2021). Second, there is an ongoing debate about whether this tilt toward local stocks arises because local investors have an information advantage or because of other factors, such as familiarity with local firms (Huberman 2001; Seasholes and Zhu 2010; Pool et al 2012).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%