2000
DOI: 10.1080/09552360050001752
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The Democratic Potential of Confucian Minben Thought

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
8
0
1

Year Published

2000
2000
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
4

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 31 publications
(9 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
8
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Leaving the concept "democracy" vague and unspecified means it could be compatible with nearly anything (see also Hu 2000: 55). Yet some writers have failed to do that much (for example , Murthy 2000;Xu 2006; Wang and Titunik 2000). Of the writers that do give some definition, these vary considerably.…”
Section: Problems With the Debatementioning
confidence: 95%
“…Leaving the concept "democracy" vague and unspecified means it could be compatible with nearly anything (see also Hu 2000: 55). Yet some writers have failed to do that much (for example , Murthy 2000;Xu 2006; Wang and Titunik 2000). Of the writers that do give some definition, these vary considerably.…”
Section: Problems With the Debatementioning
confidence: 95%
“…This paper argues that this progressiveness-particularly the concept of "people as the roots"is a manifestation of village democracy in the context of feudal Vietnam. Given that material prosperity is a critical precondition of democracy, even if this Confucian concept is not analogous to democracy itself, some of its features could facilitate the growth of an inclusive and empowered regime (Murthy 2000).…”
Section: The Concept Of People As the Roots And Its Implications For mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…the government (or ruler) should not be shied away from promoting their view(s) of the good to the people (see, e.g. Murthy 2000;Wang & Titunik 2000;Bai 2008). 13 Accordingly, the Minben philosophy of Confucianism can too provide a normative foundation to include the public interests in science and technology policy agenda-settings through public dialogues, as public dialogues enable the government to better understand the needs of the people and being more responsive to those needs;…”
Section: Responsible Innovation and Liberal Democratic Valuesmentioning
confidence: 99%