2013 IEEE 24th International Conference on Application-Specific Systems, Architectures and Processors 2013
DOI: 10.1109/asap.2013.6567564
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The Denormal Logarithmic Number System

Abstract: Abstract-Economical hardware often uses a FiXed-point Number System (FXNS), whose constant absolute precision is acceptable for many signal-processing algorithms. The almostconstant relative precision of the more expensive Floating-Point (FP) number system simplifies design, for example, by eliminating worries about FXNS overflow because the range of FP is much larger than FXNS for the same wordsize; however, primitive FP introduces another problem: underflow. The conventional Signed Logarithmic Number System … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2014
2014
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
3
2

Relationship

1
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 23 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Furthermore, while [2] only applies to denormals patterned after IEEE-754, the novel approach in this paper suggests a range of denormal representations (from one similar to IEEE-754 to a fully-denormal one similar to the µ-law for speech encoding [30]). This paper is an extended version of [47].…”
Section: Inriamentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Furthermore, while [2] only applies to denormals patterned after IEEE-754, the novel approach in this paper suggests a range of denormal representations (from one similar to IEEE-754 to a fully-denormal one similar to the µ-law for speech encoding [30]). This paper is an extended version of [47].…”
Section: Inriamentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In a very interesting paper [10], it is proposed how numbers close to zero can be represented in the denormal LNS method (DLNS) using either fixed-point or LNS representations, guaranteeing constant absolute or constant relative precisions, respectively. Up to now, LNS have not been standardized.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%