Quantum Chemistry and Dynamics of Excited States 2020
DOI: 10.1002/9781119417774.ch7
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The Density Matrix Renormalization Group for Strong Correlation in Ground and Excited States

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

1
24
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

3
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 26 publications
(25 citation statements)
references
References 257 publications
1
24
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The active space limit can be pushed further up to the order of 100 orbitals in DMRG, 85 which uses tensor decomposition methods to approximate the CASSCF wave function. While for typical DMRG calculations, active space sizes of ∼50 orbitals are manageable, 86 when applying a subsequent second-order perturbational treatment to the DMRG wave function as in CASPT2 or NEVPT2 approaches to obtain more accurate electronic energies, the active space size that can be handled computationally decreases again to ∼30 orbitals 87 for a single-point energy calculation. Figure 2 c shows an example of a so-called entanglement diagram that can be obtained from a DMRG calculation to estimate the importance of different orbitals in an active space.…”
Section: Electronic Structure Methods For Dynamics Of Transition Metal Complexesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The active space limit can be pushed further up to the order of 100 orbitals in DMRG, 85 which uses tensor decomposition methods to approximate the CASSCF wave function. While for typical DMRG calculations, active space sizes of ∼50 orbitals are manageable, 86 when applying a subsequent second-order perturbational treatment to the DMRG wave function as in CASPT2 or NEVPT2 approaches to obtain more accurate electronic energies, the active space size that can be handled computationally decreases again to ∼30 orbitals 87 for a single-point energy calculation. Figure 2 c shows an example of a so-called entanglement diagram that can be obtained from a DMRG calculation to estimate the importance of different orbitals in an active space.…”
Section: Electronic Structure Methods For Dynamics Of Transition Metal Complexesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This way, the number of parameters entering the wave function ansatz definition is reduced from exponential, as it is in full CI, to polynomial. The optimization of MPS wave functions is most commonly carried out with the DMRG approach, for the explanation of which we refer the reader to the comprehensive reviews of Schollwöck , and ref .…”
Section: Theorymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These limits can be reached very quickly, especially in polynuclear transition-metal complexes. One approach to overcome the exponential scaling of CASSCF is the density matrix renormalization group (DMRG) , for quantum chemistry, which, combined with self-consistent field orbital optimization (DMRG-SCF), , is able to variationally approximate CASSCF wave functions to arbitrary accuracy at a polynomial instead of exponential scaling of the computational cost.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Density matrix renormalization group (DMRG)[ 63 , 64 ] for quantum chemistry[ 65 , 66 , 67 , 68 , 69 ] provides a remedy to both the computational scaling and the CASSCF active space selection. It allows approximating a CASSCF calculation to an arbitrary accuracy with polynomial scaling with the active space size.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%