2009
DOI: 10.1002/j.0022-0337.2009.73.2_suppl.tb04667.x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The Dental Pipeline Program: The National Program Office Perspective

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

0
11
0

Year Published

2009
2009
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 15 publications
(11 citation statements)
references
References 14 publications
0
11
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Overall the Pipeline Program (9, 10) and the National Evaluation Report (11) showed positive gains in community‐based dental education in the fifteen Pipeline Program Schools, particularly related to the three immediate programme goals. These goals represent the short‐term gains in potential access, but to what extent are the gains sustainable now that the Foundation funding has culminated?…”
Section: Implications and Conclusionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Overall the Pipeline Program (9, 10) and the National Evaluation Report (11) showed positive gains in community‐based dental education in the fifteen Pipeline Program Schools, particularly related to the three immediate programme goals. These goals represent the short‐term gains in potential access, but to what extent are the gains sustainable now that the Foundation funding has culminated?…”
Section: Implications and Conclusionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Overall the Pipeline Program (9, 10) and the National Evaluation Report (11–14), show positive gains in CBDE, particularly in response to the three programme goals to: (1) recruit more under‐represented minorities (URMs) to the field of dentistry, (2) curricular revisions to better prepare students for culturally competent practice, and (3) increase the extramural clinical rotations in community practice settings to expose students to diverse patients. This study focuses on a longer term outcome ‐‐ the practice plans of dental school seniors immediately upon graduation and how these decisions influence the access crisis.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The Pipeline, Profession, and Practice Community‐Based Dental Education Program, through the Robert Wood Johnson Foundation (RWJF), was established to increase enrollment of underrepresented minority (URM) students in dental schools and expand the involvement of all students in community‐based dental education. From 2001 to 2010, the Pipeline Program funded initiatives at 15 U.S. dental schools designed to (1) increase the number of URM students enrolled in Pipeline dental schools; (2) provide students with didactic course and clinical experiences to prepare them for treating disadvantaged patients in community sites; and (3) have senior students spend an average of 60 days in patient‐centered community clinics and practices treating underserved patients . A total of 23 dental programs received funding in 2 rounds: 15 dental programs in the first and 8 dental programs in the second…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This demonstration program, one of the largest dental education curriculum programs in history, aimed to develop and implement curricular revisions designed to increase training on cultural competence, clinical epidemiology, public health, and patient behavior. The singularity of its curricular focus attests to their belief that elements of dental public health have been underemphasized in dental education . At the conclusion, the most common courses added to the curriculum included community dentistry, cultural competency, behavioral sciences, and preventive dentistry, but no population‐based courses were reported by the Pipeline schools .…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%