Juvenile Osteology 2009
DOI: 10.1016/b978-0-12-374635-1.00002-3
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The Dentition

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
52
0
10

Year Published

2018
2018
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
10

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 46 publications
(63 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
1
52
0
10
Order By: Relevance
“…Adult age was estimated using standard methods based on morphological changes of the pubic symphysis (Brooks and Suchey 1990) and auricular surface (Lovejoy et al 1985) when available, but cranial suture closure (Meindl and Lovejoy 1985) was used conservatively in individuals lacking observable pelves. Nonadult age was estimated primarily using dental development (AlQahtani et al 2010), and secondarily using long bone lengths and epiphyseal fusion stages (Schaefer et al 2009). Sex was determined only in adults and older adolescents (over 16 years of age) using standard morphological features of the pelvis and cranium (Acsádi and Nemeskéri 1970; Buikstra and Ubelaker 1994; Phenice 1969).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Adult age was estimated using standard methods based on morphological changes of the pubic symphysis (Brooks and Suchey 1990) and auricular surface (Lovejoy et al 1985) when available, but cranial suture closure (Meindl and Lovejoy 1985) was used conservatively in individuals lacking observable pelves. Nonadult age was estimated primarily using dental development (AlQahtani et al 2010), and secondarily using long bone lengths and epiphyseal fusion stages (Schaefer et al 2009). Sex was determined only in adults and older adolescents (over 16 years of age) using standard morphological features of the pelvis and cranium (Acsádi and Nemeskéri 1970; Buikstra and Ubelaker 1994; Phenice 1969).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The age-at-death analysis for the older juvenile was conducted using tooth eruption, whereas the age range for the younger juvenile was constructed using the ossification rate of vertebrae (Wildt 2015, 173). In our reevaluation, an age-at-death estimation was constructed based on an analysis of ossification rates of various skeletal elements following criteria established by Scheuer and Black (2000) and Schaefer and colleagues (2009). Both a closed metopic suture and the lack of an anterior bar on the ventro-lateral aspect of the articular pillar of the first cervical vertebra indicate that the age-at-death of the individual was 2–4 years.…”
Section: The Offering At Los Saposmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Most migration studies sample the first molar because the enamel mineralizes during infancy (Schaefer et al 2009), thus providing the most time between birth and burial to identify a change in residence. In this study, second molars and premolars were preferentially selected because they provide limited genetic information for biodistance studies and serve as good proxies for an individual's residence during childhood but after weaning.…”
Section: Sample Selection and Preparationmentioning
confidence: 99%