2021
DOI: 10.1016/j.jnucmat.2020.152478
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The dependence of damage accumulation on irradiation dose rate in zirconium alloys: Rate theory, atomistic simulation and experimental validation

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2025
2025

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 11 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 49 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…mimic additive manufacturing, are able to be investigated. Although some limitations due to free surface of the TEM specimen should be considered [43,44,45]. 0.1 600 30 26 4 10 600 800…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…mimic additive manufacturing, are able to be investigated. Although some limitations due to free surface of the TEM specimen should be considered [43,44,45]. 0.1 600 30 26 4 10 600 800…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As mentioned earlier in Horton et al (1981), the peak swelling temperature usually has a shift of up to hundreds Kelvin between ion and neutron irradiation conditions due to the great difference in damage rates (Saidi et al, 2021). Likewise, the damage rate in multi-ion beam irradiation, including dose rate and gas implantation rate (appm/s), are 3 to 4 orders of magnitude higher than that in fusion neutron irradiation conditions.…”
Section: The Role Of Damage Rate In Synergistic Effectsmentioning
confidence: 93%
“…Although the damage rate in MSIB irradiation can be controlled within a certain range, it is still three to four orders of magnitude higher than that of fusion neutron irradiation. This difference in damage rate can result in dramatically different irradiation effects [8,9]. Under neutron irradiation, relatively uniform and dispersed displacement cascades are formed, whereas the cascades are significantly denser due to the higher nuclear stopping power and higher fluxes under heavy ion irradiation [10].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%