2021
DOI: 10.1016/j.trd.2021.103053
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The depot and charging facility location problem for electrifying urban bus services

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
11
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 29 publications
(11 citation statements)
references
References 32 publications
0
11
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Note that, this equation is acceptable under the consideration of the short charging time and suitable to the conventional transit operation, where the dwelling time at bus stops is often less than 30s to pick up or drop off passengers. In some special scenarios, the operator intends to take a few minutes to charge the BEBs, in which the interaction between battery capacity, fleet size and schedules become more important [33], [34], [35]. For example, the travel duration for a trip increases as the charging time increases, which further result in the increase in the fleet size, under the specific bus schedule and battery capacity.…”
Section: B Minimum Beb Fleet Size Required For Each Routementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Note that, this equation is acceptable under the consideration of the short charging time and suitable to the conventional transit operation, where the dwelling time at bus stops is often less than 30s to pick up or drop off passengers. In some special scenarios, the operator intends to take a few minutes to charge the BEBs, in which the interaction between battery capacity, fleet size and schedules become more important [33], [34], [35]. For example, the travel duration for a trip increases as the charging time increases, which further result in the increase in the fleet size, under the specific bus schedule and battery capacity.…”
Section: B Minimum Beb Fleet Size Required For Each Routementioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, since every bus has a different mileage for every unit of fuel, minimizing the dead kilometer cost (DKC) is a more appropriate objective function. This has been addressed in a few studies (Forbes et al 1994;Kepaptsoglou et al 2010;Kontou et al 2014;Hsu et al 2021) mainly in countries other than India. Hence, the main objective of this study is to optimize the cost of city bus operation by minimizing the dead kilometer cost (DKC) considering the fuel cost per kilometer.…”
Section: Problem Descriptionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The hybrid GA proved immensely superior in terms of the computational time and the objective function value. Hsu et al (2021) proposed an augmented (0-1) ILP model to address the problem of the depot, charging, and maintenance-related facilities' location for the comprehensive deployment of a mixed-bus system. The objective of their study was to minimize the total cost, which included the cost of the deadhead mileage, the cost of establishing depots, maintenance, and charging stations, cost of renting external buses minus the salvage value obtained after selling off the land of existing depots.…”
Section: Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Global carbon emissions, especially from the transportation sector, have been a worldwide concern for a while now ( 1 ). To mitigate this, major economies are planning to move toward sustainable and eco-friendly transportation.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…While all these studies considered complete electrification of BEB fleets, few considered provision for partial electrification by providing measures for fleet replacement in the network ( 3 , 13 ) and proposed the bus fleet replacement problem for cost-effectively switching toward electrification. Along similar lines, in a recent work Hsu et al ( 1 ) developed an optimization model to systematically locate depots for charging facilities, the optimal number of electric buses, and the associated routes that should be serviced by them in an existing diesel-bus system.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%