2018
DOI: 10.1090/proc/13937
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The depth of a finite simple group

Abstract: Abstract. We introduce the notion of the depth of a finite group G, defined as the minimal length of an unrefinable chain of subgroups from G to the trivial subgroup. In this paper we investigate the depth of (non-abelian) finite simple groups. We determine the simple groups of minimal depth, and show, somewhat surprisingly, that alternating groups have bounded depth. We also establish general upper bounds on the depth of simple groups of Lie type, and study the relation between the depth and the much studied … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
5

Citation Types

0
58
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

3
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 8 publications
(58 citation statements)
references
References 30 publications
0
58
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The depth of finite solvable groups was studied by Kohler [14], and more generally by Shareshian and Woodroofe [19] in relation to lattice theory. We refer the reader to [3,5] for recent work on the length and depth of finite groups and finite simple groups. In [4], we extended these notions to algebraic groups.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The depth of finite solvable groups was studied by Kohler [14], and more generally by Shareshian and Woodroofe [19] in relation to lattice theory. We refer the reader to [3,5] for recent work on the length and depth of finite groups and finite simple groups. In [4], we extended these notions to algebraic groups.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Note that these parameters are independent of any choice of isogeny type. In particular, we may (and will) always assume that if G is a nonabelian compact connected Lie group, then G ′ = i S i is a commuting product of simple groups given in (3).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This invariant was studied by Kohler [15] for finite soluble groups and we refer the reader to more recent work of Shareshian and Woodroofe [22] for further results in the context of lattice theory. In [4] we proved several results on the depth of finite simple groups and we studied the relationship between the length and depth of simple groups (see [5] for further results on the length and depth of finite groups). For instance, [4,Theorem 1] classifies the simple groups of depth 3 (it is easy to see that λ(G) 3 for every non-abelian simple group G) and [4,Theorem 2] shows that alternating groups have bounded depth (more precisely, λ(A n ) 23 for all n, whereas l(A n ) tends to infinity with n).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In [4] we proved several results on the depth of finite simple groups and we studied the relationship between the length and depth of simple groups (see [5] for further results on the length and depth of finite groups). For instance, [4,Theorem 1] classifies the simple groups of depth 3 (it is easy to see that λ(G) 3 for every non-abelian simple group G) and [4,Theorem 2] shows that alternating groups have bounded depth (more precisely, λ(A n ) 23 for all n, whereas l(A n ) tends to infinity with n). Upper bounds on the depth of each simple group of Lie type over F q are presented in [4,Theorem 4]; the bounds are given in terms of k, where q = p k with p a prime.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The length of G, denoted ℓ(G), is the maximum length of an unrefinable chain, and the depth of G, denoted λ(G), is the minimum length of an unrefinable chain. By [4], a nonabelian simple group G satisfies λ(G) (1 + o(1)) ℓ(G) log 2 (ℓ(G)) .…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%