1995
DOI: 10.1007/bf02650567
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The depth of Moho in the mainland of China

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

4
12
1

Year Published

2001
2001
2016
2016

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 17 publications
(17 citation statements)
references
References 3 publications
4
12
1
Order By: Relevance
“…In the East China Sea and South China Sea (including the Hainan Island) the crustal thickness is 26±28 km. More recent crustal thickness studies (LI and MOONEY, 1997) in general con®rm previous results (ZENG et al, 1995). The new studies also reveal an intermediate ma®c lower crust with P-wave velocities of 6.9±7.0 km/sec.…”
Section: Major Geophysical Features In the Scbsupporting
confidence: 69%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…In the East China Sea and South China Sea (including the Hainan Island) the crustal thickness is 26±28 km. More recent crustal thickness studies (LI and MOONEY, 1997) in general con®rm previous results (ZENG et al, 1995). The new studies also reveal an intermediate ma®c lower crust with P-wave velocities of 6.9±7.0 km/sec.…”
Section: Major Geophysical Features In the Scbsupporting
confidence: 69%
“…The Yangtze platform is one of the three oldest stable platforms in the China continent (the other two are the Sino±Korea platform and the Tarim Basin) (ZENG et al, 1995). The Sino±Korean platform solidi®ed in the early middle Proterozoic (1700 Ma), whereas the Yangtze and Tarim platforms solidi®ed in the late Proterozoic (700 Ma).…”
Section: Tectonics Within the Scbmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Discontinuity between crust and mantle called moho discontinuity is an important one for geodynamics such as crustal evolution, tectonic activities and so on, in addition to the correcting gravity for the crustal effects, seismic 30 tomography and geothermal modeling. The depth of moho or called crust thickness varies greatly over small length scales and has significant effects on fundamental mode surface waves(Ueli Meier et al,2007).There are several methods to get moho depth, such as deep seismic sounding profile for china continent (Zeng et al,1995), inverting satellite gravity data to get whole global crust and lithophere thickness (Fang et al,1999), inverting Bouguer gravity and topography data to get moho depth for china 35 and its adjants (Huang et al,2008;Guo et al, 2012),inverting receiver function to get moho depth and Possion's ratio for china continent (Chen et al,2010;Zhu,2012 (Laske et al,2013;Stolk, et al, 2013) are based on refraction and reflection seismology as well as receiver function studies. As a consequence, resolution and consistence among different crust models are high in regions with good data coverage and uncomplicated structure but in 40 regions with poor or no data coverage or complicated structure crustal thickness estimates are largely extrapolated.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%