1980
DOI: 10.1007/bf00337398
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The derivation of nerve signals from contrast flash data

Abstract: This paper presents a new analysis of the contrast flash data of Alpern et al. (1970a--d). It was prompted by the criticism of Wandell (1976) who pointed out that Alpern et al., main conclusion, i.e, that the inhibitory signal N (phi) elicited by the contrast flash (phi) takes the form (formula: see text), would imply an unrealistic excitatory photo response. The present analysis shows the data to be consistent with an inhibitory signal of the form (formula: see text).

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

1990
1990
2005
2005

Publication Types

Select...
2
1

Relationship

0
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 33 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…32 Such a mechanism, essentially Rushton's 33 "automatic gain control," can account for a great variety of psychophysical data. 32,34,35 It is for that reason that we prefer to analyze our data in terms that are compatible with a logarithmic rather than a cube root transformation.…”
Section: Comparison With Models For Achromatic Visionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…32 Such a mechanism, essentially Rushton's 33 "automatic gain control," can account for a great variety of psychophysical data. 32,34,35 It is for that reason that we prefer to analyze our data in terms that are compatible with a logarithmic rather than a cube root transformation.…”
Section: Comparison With Models For Achromatic Visionmentioning
confidence: 99%