2003
DOI: 10.1111/1467-9310.00300
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The derivation of R&D return indicators within a real options framework

Abstract: The purpose of this paper is to rework the building blocks of real option applications and to introduce a basket option framework. We find that the characteristic parameters of the risk neutral density function implied in observed share prices within the real option framework represent a novel category of R&D return indicators. Empirical evidence for a set of 13 US bio-pharmaceutical companies is provided. The novel R&D return indicator can be used to analyse investor's expectations on R&D success of a particu… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
6
0

Year Published

2006
2006
2013
2013

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 12 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 19 publications
0
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Multiple assets have been examined by Wörner et al (2002Wörner et al ( , 2003, who describe a rm as a`basket option' that conducts several R&D projects, or as an option on a set of stochastic variables. Yet, as they focus on the value of a single claim that pertains to many random variables, their analysis does not derive results relevant to portfolio management (which inherently deals with the selection between multiple claims).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Multiple assets have been examined by Wörner et al (2002Wörner et al ( , 2003, who describe a rm as a`basket option' that conducts several R&D projects, or as an option on a set of stochastic variables. Yet, as they focus on the value of a single claim that pertains to many random variables, their analysis does not derive results relevant to portfolio management (which inherently deals with the selection between multiple claims).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A significant proportion of this literature has focused on the extent to which decision makers' intuition is consistent with real-option theory (Busby & Pitts, 1997;Howell & Jägle, 1997;Remer, Ang & Baden-Fuller, 2001;Verbeeten, 2006) and there is general agreement that biotechnology/pharmaceuticals firms' market value can be considered as the value of a basket of real options on their R&D portfolio (Ely et al, 2003;Woerner & Grupp, 2003;Hartman & Hassan, 2006). A theme is this literature is a call for better educated decision makers to realise the benefits of the real-options approach for investment appraisal.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…While it is evident that there is considerable variation in the application and understanding of real-options generally, the biotechnology/pharmaceuticals sector is 16 often cited as an industry where real options analysis is applicable and where firms' market value can be considered as the value of a basket of real options on their R&D portfolio (Ely et al, 2003;Woerner & Grupp, 2003;Hartman & Hassan, 2006). Real-options is also the application of option-pricing to non-financial instruments.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In particular, these real options are subject to uncertainty, i.e. the value of the options changes as time evolves and new information about the investment project comes in (Wu, Yen 2007;Wörner, Grupp 2003;Jerak, Wagner 2006;Ernst et al 2010;Verdu et al 2012). Three levels of real option thinking can be distinguished (Faulkner 1996;Wu, Yen 2007;Wörner, Grupp 2003;Dissel et al 2005).…”
Section: Review and Classification Of Technology Valuation Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%