2014
DOI: 10.4028/www.scientific.net/amm.635-637.1900
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The Design and Realization of HRA Service System for the Engine Assembly

Abstract: Human error is a main factor causing the engine assembly quality defects. This paper presented the application of the Root Cause Retrospective Analysis (RCRA) of the Cognitive Reliability and Error Analysis Method (CREAM) in the engine assembly process, proposed a new model of the RCRA for engine assembly failure within the framework of HRA (Human Reliability Analysis) service system for the engine assembly. The application of the model was illustrated by an example. The research belongs to one of the core fun… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
3

Relationship

0
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 5 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Concerning the causes of errors, Torres et al highlighted that, during the execution of manual assembly tasks, some operations are the most likely to cause errors because the level of difficulty is very high [28]. In other cases, the main reason for the errors can be related to the poor skills of the operators or the adverse psychology, often due to the scarce confidence in the working environment or the lack of safety awareness [29]. The psychological factors which ledd to human errors have been widely debated in the literature, beginning from 1990, when the study of HRA started combining different areas of scientific studies, such as behavioral science and psychology [30].…”
Section: Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Concerning the causes of errors, Torres et al highlighted that, during the execution of manual assembly tasks, some operations are the most likely to cause errors because the level of difficulty is very high [28]. In other cases, the main reason for the errors can be related to the poor skills of the operators or the adverse psychology, often due to the scarce confidence in the working environment or the lack of safety awareness [29]. The psychological factors which ledd to human errors have been widely debated in the literature, beginning from 1990, when the study of HRA started combining different areas of scientific studies, such as behavioral science and psychology [30].…”
Section: Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%