Proceedings of International Symposium on Phased Array Systems and Technology
DOI: 10.1109/past.1996.566096
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The design, development and testing of the THAAD (Theater High Altitude Area Defense) solid state phased array (formerly ground based radar)

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
5
0

Publication Types

Select...
5
1
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 24 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Moreover, due to the mechanical movement of the probe antenna, the measurement process is very timeconsuming, especially for large-scale phased array antennas. For example, for the THAAD (Theater High Altitude Area Defense) radar, each of the 25,344 T/R modules had to be near-field scanned individually, result in a very long and even unacceptable test time [48,49]. Therefore, the near-field scanning probe method is most suitable for initial factory test rather than periodic in-field calibration.…”
Section: A the Near-field Scanning Probe Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Moreover, due to the mechanical movement of the probe antenna, the measurement process is very timeconsuming, especially for large-scale phased array antennas. For example, for the THAAD (Theater High Altitude Area Defense) radar, each of the 25,344 T/R modules had to be near-field scanned individually, result in a very long and even unacceptable test time [48,49]. Therefore, the near-field scanning probe method is most suitable for initial factory test rather than periodic in-field calibration.…”
Section: A the Near-field Scanning Probe Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These calibration methods vary from different systems and applications, either suitable for factory test or for in-field test [41]. Some methods such as the near-field scanning probe method and the peripheral fixed probe method require additional equipments [42][43][44][45][46][47][48][49][50][51][52][53][54][55][56][57][58][59][60], while the mutual coupling method takes advantage of the inherent property of the phased array without the need for extra hardware [61][62][63][64][65][66][67][68][69][70][71]. For Si-based integrated phased array antenna, it's very common to design a dedicated coupling network that using transmission lines connected to each antenna element for periodic in-field calibration [72][73][74][75][76][77][78][79][80][81][82][83][84][85][86]…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The objective of a phased array antenna calibration is to sample each antenna element in the array, and compare the obtained results to identify the differences in excitation among the elements. Phased array calibration can be classified in two main types, initial and in-situ [7], [8]. As the name suggests, initial calibration is the first alignment check performed on the phased array system, whereas, insitu calibration refers to the one performed on the operation location.…”
Section: While the Conventional Methods In An Anechoic Chambermentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Moreover, there are other mutual coupling-based techniques, developed specifically for in-situ applications, which rely on the results obtained by initial calibration. Examples of this are [7], [18], [22], [23], which employ embedded elements that monitor the current state of the array, and compare the results with the ones initially obtained; any difference between current and initial states is considered a misalignment.…”
Section: While the Conventional Methods In An Anechoic Chambermentioning
confidence: 99%
“…ere has been great work on calibrating phased arrays. A usual calibration method utilized in anechoic chambers is the near-eld scanning probe method [17,18], with which each channel is switched on and scatter parameters are measured when the probe scans exactly above the antenna element. is demands complex devices and accurate position systems and only applies to in-factory calibration.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%