2006
DOI: 10.1108/09684880610678540
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The desired teaching qualities of lecturers in higher education: a means end analysis

Abstract: Purpose -The study aims to develop a deeper understanding of the teaching qualities of effective lecturers that students desire and to uncover the constructs that underlie these desire expectations and reveal the underlying benefits that students look for.Design/Methodology/Approach -A semi-standardized qualitative technique called laddering was applied that allows researchers to reach deeper levels of reality and to reveal the reasons behind the reasons. The study was conducted amongst teacher education stude… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

7
44
0
10

Year Published

2009
2009
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7
2

Relationship

2
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 85 publications
(61 citation statements)
references
References 84 publications
7
44
0
10
Order By: Relevance
“…Hill, Lomas, and MacGregor (2003) investigated students' perception of quality education and discovered that students appreciated lecturers who are well organized and knowledgeable in their subjects. Similar results were obtained by Voss and Gruber (2006) where students prefer teachers who are knowledgeable, enthusiastic, approachable, and friendly. Geall (2000) meanwhile found teacher attributes appreciated by the students were: giving feedback during classes and in assignments, and being helpful and friendly.…”
Section: Teaching Effectiveness and Student Ratingsupporting
confidence: 80%
“…Hill, Lomas, and MacGregor (2003) investigated students' perception of quality education and discovered that students appreciated lecturers who are well organized and knowledgeable in their subjects. Similar results were obtained by Voss and Gruber (2006) where students prefer teachers who are knowledgeable, enthusiastic, approachable, and friendly. Geall (2000) meanwhile found teacher attributes appreciated by the students were: giving feedback during classes and in assignments, and being helpful and friendly.…”
Section: Teaching Effectiveness and Student Ratingsupporting
confidence: 80%
“…Third, he/she should have a good sense of humour since students prefer attending to an interesting class [35] [36]. Finally, he/she should adopt appropriate teaching method in order to appeal students to learn [34] [37]. In short, Huang and Lin proposed that a teacher possesses of the four characteristics, including professional knowledge, positive character traits, sweet humour and good teaching techniques, can be regarded as a charismatic teacher [31].…”
Section: Teacher's Charismamentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The teacher should have knowledge and can use this knowledge in teaching practice. Second, because a teacher is expected to be good role models for students, he/she should have positive character traits (e.g., friendliness, approachability, patience and enthusiasm) [32] [34]. Third, he/she should have a good sense of humour since students prefer attending to an interesting class [35] [36].…”
Section: Teacher's Charismamentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Two sets of cards were used, one for the descriptions of positive incidents and one for the anecdotes of negative incidents. These incident summaries were then classified using the list of quality dimensions identified by authors such as Andreson (2000), Sander et al (2000), Lammers and Murphy (2002), Hill et al (2003), Brown (2004), Swanson et al (2005), and Voss and Gruber (2006).…”
Section: Classification Of Incidentsmentioning
confidence: 99%