2007
DOI: 10.1007/s12197-007-9012-4
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The determinants and survival of reverse mergers vs IPOs

Abstract: Reverse mergers, Takeovers, G34,

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

1
39
0

Year Published

2011
2011
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 74 publications
(50 citation statements)
references
References 13 publications
1
39
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Consistent with prior research, survival was determined by whether or not the stock was delisted due to negative reasons within 3 years following the IPO year (e.g., Adjei et al 2008;Fischer and Pollock 2004). Examples of negative reasons include liquidation (codes 400-490) or dropped for other reasons such as being delinquent (codes 520-590).…”
Section: Dependent Variablesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Consistent with prior research, survival was determined by whether or not the stock was delisted due to negative reasons within 3 years following the IPO year (e.g., Adjei et al 2008;Fischer and Pollock 2004). Examples of negative reasons include liquidation (codes 400-490) or dropped for other reasons such as being delinquent (codes 520-590).…”
Section: Dependent Variablesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The lack of underwriter monitoring and less stringent regulation requirements in the process of reverse acquisition increase earnings management opportunity in Chinese RM firms (Feldman, 2009;Lee and Masulis, 2011). Moreover, a typical RM firm tends to have relatively low fundamental quality and a high degree of information asymmetry (Adjei et al, 2008;Gleason, 2005). Compared with regular US firms and other Chinese US-listed firms, Chinese RM firms with inferior fundamentals have higher incentives and greater opportunity to manage earnings in the years around reverse acquisition to boost stock prices, sustain overvaluation or increase the probability of raising capital in the future.…”
Section: Accepted Manuscriptmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Using simulation analysis, they show that even modest correlation between these volatility metrics and the partitioning variable (e.g., the indicator of Chinese RM firms) severely increases the risk of incorrectly rejecting the null hypothesis. In fact, RMs, particularly Chinese RM firms, are found to have higher debt and higher volatility in fundamentals (Adjei et al, 2008;Chu et al, 2014;Gleason et al, 2005;Lee et al, 2013).…”
Section: Accepted Manuscriptmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…To mitigate the potential self-selection bias, we employ the Heckman (1976) two-stage procedure. Adjei et al (2008) examine the determinants of reverse mergers versus IPOs, and we use their model in our first stage of the Heckman procedure to estimate the inverse Mills ratio. Specifically, we estimate the following probit model to calculate the inverse Mills ratio:…”
Section: Self-selection Biasmentioning
confidence: 99%