2003
DOI: 10.1093/jpart/mug025
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The Determinants of Flexibility and Innovation in the Government Workplace: Recent Evidence from Canada

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

3
26
1
3

Year Published

2011
2011
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 17 publications
(33 citation statements)
references
References 18 publications
3
26
1
3
Order By: Relevance
“…Such an approach ignores powerful institutional forces that may operate to undermine the intent of even the most progressive WLB policies. These systemic factors include work overload — poor work design or heavy workloads, a culture of long hours, adverse career consequences and gendered role stereotypes (Bailyn and Fletcher, 2002; Hudson, 2005; Lonti and Verma, 2003; McDonald et al ., 2005; Overington, 2006). The WLB discourse often obscures structural and relational levels of analysis, thereby leaving unchallenged the substantial barriers to long‐term sustainable WLB (Caproni, 2004; Lewis et al ., 2007; Smithson and Stokoe, 2005).…”
Section: Wlb and The Role Of Managementmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Such an approach ignores powerful institutional forces that may operate to undermine the intent of even the most progressive WLB policies. These systemic factors include work overload — poor work design or heavy workloads, a culture of long hours, adverse career consequences and gendered role stereotypes (Bailyn and Fletcher, 2002; Hudson, 2005; Lonti and Verma, 2003; McDonald et al ., 2005; Overington, 2006). The WLB discourse often obscures structural and relational levels of analysis, thereby leaving unchallenged the substantial barriers to long‐term sustainable WLB (Caproni, 2004; Lewis et al ., 2007; Smithson and Stokoe, 2005).…”
Section: Wlb and The Role Of Managementmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Certain organizations are more likely than others to adopt policies and programs designed to provide employees with flexible work options. Previous studies (e.g., Lonti and Verma ; Matz‐Costa and Pitt‐Catsouphes ; Pitt‐Catsouphes, Sano, and Matz‐Costa ) have pointed to a number of factors underlying the decision of organizations to provide these options to their employees, including characteristics of managers and top decision makers such as age, workforce characteristics such as the percentage of employees in professional occupations, and organizational characteristics such as the number of employees. It would be misleading to assume, however, that instituting favorable organizational policies (e.g., a phased retirement program) necessarily means that workers utilize those options (e.g., by phasing into retirement).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Or, nos résultats rapportent qu'une grande majorité des répondants profitent d'une telle autonomie, qu'ils travaillent au sein d'équipes et qu'il existe de la polyvalence dans les tâches qu'ils accomplissent. Nos résultats de recherche sont conformes aux résultats obtenus par Lonti et Verma () et Morgeson et Humphrey (). Ainsi nos propres résultats, obtenus auprès de six ministères ou organismes gouvernementaux, suggèrent que l'administration publique – québécoise et canadienne (fédérale) – déploie des pratiques innovantes qui se situent dans la moyenne des pratiques adoptées dans d'autres milieux.…”
Section: Discussion Des Résultatsunclassified
“…En bref, plus il y a d'autonomie dans la gestion des unités de travail, plus les méthodes de travail sont flexibles (Lonti et Verma ). L'autonomie des employés est un facteur de satisfaction non négligeable (Paquet et Gosselin ; Haar et Spell ).…”
Section: La Problématique Des Innovations Du Travailunclassified