2008
DOI: 10.1093/oxrep/grn022
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The determinants of migrant remittances

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

4
200
0
9

Year Published

2013
2013
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7
2

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 207 publications
(213 citation statements)
references
References 26 publications
4
200
0
9
Order By: Relevance
“…Low-income individuals are less likely to remit overall because they need their resources to subsist (Carling 2008); when they do remit, they may shoulder a greater burden than those with higher incomes. In the U.S., people who entered as humanitarian migrants (e.g., refugees, asylum seekers) report poorer health compared to those who migrated under employment visas (Akresh and Frank 2008).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Low-income individuals are less likely to remit overall because they need their resources to subsist (Carling 2008); when they do remit, they may shoulder a greater burden than those with higher incomes. In the U.S., people who entered as humanitarian migrants (e.g., refugees, asylum seekers) report poorer health compared to those who migrated under employment visas (Akresh and Frank 2008).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Rapoport and Docquier, 2006;Carling, 2008;Bounie et al, 2013) and the determinants of the amounts remitted (e.g. Holst et al, 2008;Bollard et al, 2011).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Visits may also be used as arenas for the display of acquired economic and cultural capitals (Hemming 2009), and thus give individuals an opportunity to enjoy their upward social mobility in Burundi. The important role of cultural capital such as citizenship in enabling mobility is also essential (Ley and Kobayashi 2005;Carling 2008;Ley 2010).…”
Section: Capitalmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The discourse on return migration within the political field in Norway and UK is dominated by the two countries' respective ministries of justice and their perspectives on the facilitation of return migration, both voluntary and involuntary. Carling (2008) introduces the concept of mobility resources to capture the role of legal status in creating inequalities between migrants and non-migrants. These resources may also yield asymmetries between different legal categories of migrants, which again determine the patterns of their transnational social practices, including return visits.…”
Section: Inter-field Relationsmentioning
confidence: 99%