2018
DOI: 10.2139/ssrn.2939064
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The Determinants of Online Review Informativeness: Evidence from Field Experiments on Airbnb

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

6
199
2
9

Year Published

2018
2018
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
4
3
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 162 publications
(216 citation statements)
references
References 10 publications
6
199
2
9
Order By: Relevance
“…Market design principles have generally focused on increasing the information flow within a platform (Bolton et al 2013, Che and HÖrner 2014, Dai et al 2014, Fradkin et al 2014), but we highlight a situation in which platforms may be providing too much information.…”
Section: A Designing a Discrimination-free Marketplacementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Market design principles have generally focused on increasing the information flow within a platform (Bolton et al 2013, Che and HÖrner 2014, Dai et al 2014, Fradkin et al 2014), but we highlight a situation in which platforms may be providing too much information.…”
Section: A Designing a Discrimination-free Marketplacementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Studies focusing on the motivations behind joining Airbnb to provide hospitality have pointed out that monetary compensation and sociability are two important aspects [19,22]. Fradkin et al experimentally investigated the determinants and bias in the Airbnb review system [14]. Fradkin proposed ranking algorithms for the Airbnb search engine [13].…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These results may suggest that many guests had overall positive experiences during their stays, corroborating advocates' argument on traveler experiences. It can also indicate the presence of selection bias in review behaviors [14]-only those who had great experiences chose to give reviews.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Under a critical lens, scholars have begun to look at questions of power [56] and inequality [1], covering algorithms [17,62], information asymmetries [69], collective action [66], and ratings [30,52,73]. However, limited research to date has looked at the psychological and emotional repercussions of the sharing economy on providers or consumers.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This mechanism works in a form of indirect reciprocity, where information about participants can be shared among a network [12,43,50]. For example, the key trust mechanism on Airbnb is the review feature [30,73], while Uber and other ride-sharing platforms rely on bilateral user ratings [52].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%