The determinants of tendering periods for PPP procurement in the UK: an empirical analysis

Reeves, Eoin; Palcic, Dónal; Flannery, Darragh; Geddes, R. Richard

doi:10.1080/00036846.2016.1210779

Cited by 29 publications

(21 citation statements)

References 30 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…In addition, control variables include investment, regions, return models, operation models, project demonstration types, initiated time, and duration. The reasons are as follows: Reeves et al (2015 , 2017) , Carter et al (2019) , Palcic et al (2019) regarded investment as a proxy variable of project complexity, but Baldi et al (2016) believed that there are limitations in the investment as a proxy variable of project complexity. Therefore, we took the investment as a control variable.…”

Section: Research Design and Data Sourcesmentioning

confidence: 99%

Factors Influencing Procurement Officers’ Preference for PPP Procurement Model: An Empirical Analysis of China

Cao

Wang

2022

Front. Psychol.

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

The selection of the procurement model, which is a process of discretion exercised by procurement officials, is crucial to the Public-private Partnership (PPP) procurement performance. From theoretical analysis and international practice, we could find that the negotiation method is more suitable for complex PPP projects, while the tendering method is widely used in China’s PPP procurement. To analyze the reasons for the phenomenon, we used the logit regression model to examine the influence of regulatory competition, risk aversion preference, and tacit interaction on the procurement model selection based on the data of 8,926 PPP projects from 2009 to 2021 in China. The results indicate that regulatory competition leads to confusion in procurement model selection, while risk aversion preference and tacit interaction significantly promote the application of tendering. Moreover, the heterogeneity analysis of regions and return models prove that provincial capitals and municipalities are more susceptible to regulatory competition, risk aversion preference, and tacit interaction than ordinary cities. Compared with user-pay projects, government-pay projects and viability gap funding projects are more susceptible to regulatory competition and risk aversion preference, and less affected by tacit interaction. Therefore, to optimize the procurement model selection, policymakers should improve procurement policies to reduce the adverse effects of regulatory competition, risk aversion preference, and tacit interactions.

show abstract

Section: Research Design and Data Sourcesmentioning

confidence: 99%

Factors Influencing Procurement Officers’ Preference for PPP Procurement Model: An Empirical Analysis of China

Cao

Wang

2022

Front. Psychol.

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…The results of these studies have identified risk, financing, procurement and contracting, performance, economic viability and value for money, success factors and governance issues as the key focus area. Extensive focus has been given to risk (Chou and Pramudawardhani, 2015;Kumaraswamy et al, 2018;Pellegrino et al, 2013;Ameyaw and Chan, 2015), financing (Iyer and Sagheer, 2011;Glumac et al, 2015), procurement and contracting (Reeves et al, 2017;Liu et al, 2016), performance (Yuan et al, 2012;Liu et al, 2014;Mladenovic et al, 2013), economic viability and value for money (Agarchand and Laishram, 2017;Mladenovic et al, 2013) and success factors (Kwofie et al, 2016;Chou and Pramudawardhani, 2015;Jacobson and Choi, 2008). However, despite the rapid and extensive development by way of research into these factors, the knowledge and development in the governance domain are still at a nascent stage.…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Significant governance factors in PPP infrastructure delivery performance in Ghana

Kwofie

Ellis

Opoku

2021

JOPP

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Purpose Inefficiencies in public-private partnership (PPP) has been attributed to deficient and poor governance practices and structures. It has been recognized that a veritable way to achieve efficiency in PPP governance is through gaining an understanding of the theoretical, practical and contextual factors that underline governance practices in PPP project delivery. The purpose of this study is to explore the significant governance factors in PPP project performance and delivery. Design/methodology/approach Using a questionnaire survey on major players in PPPs in policy, research, consultancy and professionals, the study sought to delineate the significant governance factors that impact PPP project delivery performance. Findings A step-wise multiple regression analysis revealed effective communication and openness in sharing project information systems, competent, responsible and effective project leadership, trust-building processes, systems and practices, best practice organizational and team norms, team culture, cohesion practices, effective relationship management practices, robust policy diffusion and transfer processes, friendly business environment and government support and contractual and renegotiation flexibility as the key contractual and non-contractual governance factors that can predict about 79% level of PPP project delivery performance. Social implications The findings offer support to improve PPP delivery in governance. Originality/value These findings are, thus, useful toward evolving regulatory quality governance mechanisms, flexible supervision and quality decisions that can enhance value for money in PPP projects in PPP project delivery.

show abstract

“…In addition, risk and success factors are of researchers' interests, in a particular of risk evaluation and allocation [7,8]. Moreover, a large number of studies have been conducted on management viewpoints, for example, procurement management [9], contract management [10] and performance management [11]. Of the governmental viewpoint, several topics have been shaped including modelling governance [12], implementing governance [13] and regulations [14].…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Examining influenced factors of the preparation phase on total construction time delay of build-operate-transfer transport projects in Vietnam

Hoang-Tung¹,

Pham²

2019

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

The involvement of private investors in public works has been widely-known under the scheme of Public-Private Partnerships (PPP) world-wide. Although being started in early years of the twenty-one century, the PPP scheme in Vietnam is still waiting for its booming period due to an incomprehensive regulation system. As of an approval of some important PPP decrees, the period of 2010-2018 is considered as a remarked period for the PPP development in Vietnam, especially in transport sector. Using the neural network approach, this study contributes to the literature by providing an insight of 48 build-operate-transfer (BOT) transport projects completed in the period. Findings of this study are meaningful to the field because they highlight several influenced factors of the project preparation phase those affect total completed construction time of the investigated projects.

show abstract

The determinants of tendering periods for PPP procurement in the UK: an empirical analysis

Cited by 29 publications

References 30 publications

Factors Influencing Procurement Officers’ Preference for PPP Procurement Model: An Empirical Analysis of China

Factors Influencing Procurement Officers’ Preference for PPP Procurement Model: An Empirical Analysis of China

Significant governance factors in PPP infrastructure delivery performance in Ghana

Examining influenced factors of the preparation phase on total construction time delay of build-operate-transfer transport projects in Vietnam

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About