1981
DOI: 10.1016/0021-9797(81)90132-6
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The determination of pore-size distributions from sorption isotherms and mercury penetration in interconnected pores: The application of percolation theory

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
75
0

Year Published

1990
1990
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
4
4

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 112 publications
(76 citation statements)
references
References 3 publications
1
75
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This transformation assumes that the porous medium is a bundle of nonintersecting tubes, which is clearly an unreasonable assumption for most sedimentary rocks. The transformation to pore sizes also is misleading because mercury intrusion is a percolation phenomenon, where the filling of a network of pores occurs as a sequential process (Lane et al, 1986;Wall and Brown, 1981). In order for an interior pore to be filled, it must be connected to the outer surface by a Pore 0.1 microns Figure 1.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This transformation assumes that the porous medium is a bundle of nonintersecting tubes, which is clearly an unreasonable assumption for most sedimentary rocks. The transformation to pore sizes also is misleading because mercury intrusion is a percolation phenomenon, where the filling of a network of pores occurs as a sequential process (Lane et al, 1986;Wall and Brown, 1981). In order for an interior pore to be filled, it must be connected to the outer surface by a Pore 0.1 microns Figure 1.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Similar isotherms can result from more than one arrangement of empty space within the solid, and deduction of the nature of porosity of a sample from the observed isotherm depends upon assumptions about the nature of the porosity and the distribution of the adsorbed fluid within the pores. Therefore, isotherms themselves are usually not enough information upon which to base firm conclusions, particularly in cases where percolation effects in a system of interconnected pores influence the desorption process [1][2][3].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It is recalled that, in the absence or nucleation, primary desorption is an ordinary percolation process [71,72,76,80,109,123], while secondary desorption requires the solution to a growth problem from a fixed number of sources as discussed in [80]. In the presence of nucleation, the desorption process (primary or secondary) is neither of the above.…”
Section: {17)mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…By contrast, in the cylindrical geometry bonds, 8 changes from 1 for desorption to 1/2 for adsorption. This difference reflects local hysteresis for elements of cylindrical geometry, and it is tacitly assumed negligible [70,71,72,76,109,123]. In the case of a single pore (infinite· connectivity), the above define the relative pressure for phase change in the element of size r. One may then parameterize the proeess (adsorption, desorption) by a variable radius, denoted hereafter for consistency [56,57,80,79] byrd, and obtained from (1) and (2) by taking 8 = 1.…”
Section: Effects Of Nucleationmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation