1962
DOI: 10.1016/s0003-2670(00)88380-4
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The determination of some aliphatic alcohols and aldehydes by oxidation with acid potassium dichromate

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
17
0

Year Published

1964
1964
2011
2011

Publication Types

Select...
10

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 30 publications
(17 citation statements)
references
References 8 publications
0
17
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The concentration of the ethanol was determined using the oxidation process, and K 2 Cr 2 O 7 was used as the oxidant. , The reproducibility of the determination of the alcohol mass fraction was less than ±0.5%.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The concentration of the ethanol was determined using the oxidation process, and K 2 Cr 2 O 7 was used as the oxidant. , The reproducibility of the determination of the alcohol mass fraction was less than ±0.5%.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The amount of the propan-1-ol or propan-2-ol was determined using the oxidation process, and the K 2 Cr 2 O 7 was used as oxidant. , The reproducibility of the determination of the propan-1-ol or propan-2-ol mass fraction was less than ± 0.5 %. The solid phase in equilibrium was filtered carefully and analyzed using TGA (performed on a TA-SDT Q600 thermal analyzer in air atmosphere with a heating rate of 10 °C /min).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The concentration of rubidium salt in the equilibrium solid or liquid phases was determined by tetraphenylboron rubidium gravimetrical analysis 7 or alternatively by evaporating the solution to dryness at a temperature that was lower than the decomposition temperature of each rubidium salt. The potassium dichromate oxidation method , was adopted to measure the ethanol content in the equilibrium phases. The uncertainties in the mass fraction measurements of the rubidium salt and ethanol were estimated to be ±0.1 % and ±0.5 %, respectively.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%