“…Further, powder XRD was pursued on various samples, which also confirmed the presence Fe, Cu, and sand in the prepared nanocomposites. XRD patterns of only sand (Figure a) showed diffractions at 2θ values of 21.0(100-Q), 25.7(002-K), 27(011-Q), 28.4(002-A), 35.5(201-K/131-I), 36.8(110-Q/200-K), 39.7(131-K, 111-Q), 42.8(200-Q), 46.1(201-Q), 50.5(112-Q), 55.2(204-K/240-K/022-Q), 59.96(121-Q), and 68.1(122-Q)°, indicating the presence of quartz (Q), kaolinite (K), Illite (I), and albite (A). − The sand–Fe nanocomposites (Figure b) showed major characteristic peaks of iron oxide NPs (Fe 2 O 3 ) at 2θ values of 33.2(104), 35.7(110), 49.49(024), 54.1(116), 62.5(214), 72.6(119), and 75.1 (220)°. Further, peaks at 30.2(220) and 56.9(511) indicated the formation of Fe 3 O 4 . ,− Peaks at 27.1(011), 36.5(110), 42.9(200), and 68.2(122)° suggested the presence of quartz in the sample as well. − Figure c corresponds to sand–Fe–Cu nanocomposites where peaks at 2θ values of 24.4(012), 33.12(104), 35.6(110), 39.9(006), 40.9(113), 63.9(300), and 69.2(208)°, confirmed the presence of iron oxide NPs (Fe 2 O 3 ).…”