1989
DOI: 10.1016/0304-3991(89)90227-1
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The determination of the structure and composition at interfaces to atomic resolution

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

1990
1990
2005
2005

Publication Types

Select...
3

Relationship

0
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 21 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Although Gaussian functions were used here, other functions could easily be incorporated into the fitting program. FCA works best for narrow boundaries (Boothroyd et al ., 1989). As well as having a lower inherent resolution, EFTEM is more sensitive to experimental limitations to the resolution such as alignment and focusing errors and specimen drift because the sampling density of the images tends to be lower (to achieve an acceptable signal/noise ratio).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Although Gaussian functions were used here, other functions could easily be incorporated into the fitting program. FCA works best for narrow boundaries (Boothroyd et al ., 1989). As well as having a lower inherent resolution, EFTEM is more sensitive to experimental limitations to the resolution such as alignment and focusing errors and specimen drift because the sampling density of the images tends to be lower (to achieve an acceptable signal/noise ratio).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%