2010
DOI: 10.1002/jps.22217
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The Developability Classification System: Application of Biopharmaceutics Concepts to Formulation Development

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

6
194
0
4

Year Published

2012
2012
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
5
4

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 346 publications
(216 citation statements)
references
References 96 publications
6
194
0
4
Order By: Relevance
“…In terms of in vivo application of nanosuspensions, although oral absorption is considered to be limited by saturation solubility rather than by dissolution rate at high doses, 42) our results revealed that nanosuspensions were effective even at 300 mg/kg for both cilostazol and danazol, in accordance with previous reports that nanosuspensions improved oral absorption in high-dose in vivo studies. [43][44][45][46] The degree of enhancement of AUC 0-24 h by the use of nanosuspensions was higher for cilostazol than for danazol, although the in vitro dissolution rates were increased similarly, and the changes in crystalline properties were not significant for either compound.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 92%
“…In terms of in vivo application of nanosuspensions, although oral absorption is considered to be limited by saturation solubility rather than by dissolution rate at high doses, 42) our results revealed that nanosuspensions were effective even at 300 mg/kg for both cilostazol and danazol, in accordance with previous reports that nanosuspensions improved oral absorption in high-dose in vivo studies. [43][44][45][46] The degree of enhancement of AUC 0-24 h by the use of nanosuspensions was higher for cilostazol than for danazol, although the in vitro dissolution rates were increased similarly, and the changes in crystalline properties were not significant for either compound.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 92%
“…This is because in the context of protecting patients, it is more important to ensure changes to products that result in altered in vivo performance are correctly classified rather than the misclassification of those that do not. The limitation of its use as a development tool was highlighted by several authors (Butler et al, 2010;Rinaki et al 2003).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Butler (Butler et al, 2010) presented a Develop-ability Classification System (DCS) linking regions of biopharmaceutical space to formulation strategy. He assessed compounds in regard to their difficulty in formulating to maximum oral absorption.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Different decision trees have been published in the literature; some are based on resource considerations (1), whereas others focus more on linking the formulation selection to specific compound properties. In many of these later cases, the Biopharmaceutics Classification System (BCS) (2) or variations of that are used to guide formulation selection (3)(4)(5); however, more complex approaches have also been suggested (6).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%