2013
DOI: 10.1089/lap.2013.0196
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The Development and Evaluation of a Novel Thoracoscopic Diaphragmatic Hernia Repair Simulator

Abstract: We successfully created a thoracic space relevant to a thoracoscopic DH repair and completed the model using inexpensive, readily accessible materials. After participants performed a simulated thoracoscopic DH repair, their ratings indicated the simulator was relevant to clinical practice and valuable as a learning tool but still requires improvements. Improvements and additional evaluation of validity evidence (content, internal structure, response processes, and relationship to other variables) are necessary… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
12
0
3

Year Published

2014
2014
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
9
1

Relationship

3
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 32 publications
(15 citation statements)
references
References 12 publications
0
12
0
3
Order By: Relevance
“…[2][3][4] Excellent validated models already exist that faithfully replicate the characteristics of tissues and anatomical structures. Specifically concerning the neonatal MIS simulation, these models exist for the congenital diaphragmatic hernia (CDH) 3,5 and esophageal atresia 6 repair. However, they are not easily reproduced or acquired by a resident.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…[2][3][4] Excellent validated models already exist that faithfully replicate the characteristics of tissues and anatomical structures. Specifically concerning the neonatal MIS simulation, these models exist for the congenital diaphragmatic hernia (CDH) 3,5 and esophageal atresia 6 repair. However, they are not easily reproduced or acquired by a resident.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Taking the OAs into account (all aligning with somewhat easy to perform), variability in self-reported ability levels seems to reflect an authentic skill variability among participants that parallels studies performed in the past with participants with varying degrees of experience. [22][23][24] There are a number of limitations in the interpretation and application of the findings in this study. The first limitation is associated with the small sample size.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 85%
“…The initial content validity evidence is consistent with high physical attribute ratings and support use of the model as a valuable educational tool. 21 The duodenal atresia model is a size appropriate newborn abdominal cavity with a silicone stomach, duodenum with type III atresia, and normal intestinal rotation (鈻篎ig 2). 20 Content validity evidence again supports high physical attribute ratings and use of the model for pediatric surgical education (unpublished data).…”
Section: Simulation-based Educationmentioning
confidence: 99%