1999
DOI: 10.1046/j.1365-2923.1999.00258.x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The development and evaluation of a personal learning log for Senior House Officers

Abstract: While the problems of hospital training are well documented, an attempt to improve the situation using a learning log did not have a statistically significant impact on SHO knowledge or confidence. A six-month hospital post appears to present many opportunities for learning but these are not exploited. It is suggested that three things are needed. Firstly, active participation by and personalized feedback from a senior member of staff, with training where needed. Secondly, protected time for tutorials with a p… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
10
0

Year Published

2001
2001
2012
2012

Publication Types

Select...
9
1

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 12 publications
(10 citation statements)
references
References 16 publications
0
10
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Simple learning diaries (i.e. descriptions or accounts of an experience with no summary of what was learned as a result) have generally been found to be ineffective (Jolly, 1999;Kelly & Murray, 1999;Dolmans, Schmidt, van der Beek & Beintema, 1999). Challis, Mathers, Howe & Field (1997) compared general practitioners' use of learning portfolios (with both descriptions and analyses of experiences) to traditional continuing education documentation, and noted the portfolio's superiority in encouraging interaction with peers, and connection of learning with day-to-day practice.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Simple learning diaries (i.e. descriptions or accounts of an experience with no summary of what was learned as a result) have generally been found to be ineffective (Jolly, 1999;Kelly & Murray, 1999;Dolmans, Schmidt, van der Beek & Beintema, 1999). Challis, Mathers, Howe & Field (1997) compared general practitioners' use of learning portfolios (with both descriptions and analyses of experiences) to traditional continuing education documentation, and noted the portfolio's superiority in encouraging interaction with peers, and connection of learning with day-to-day practice.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Senior house officers (the equivalent of CT1 and CT2 trainees in the current UK postgraduate training scheme) in the emergency department and an obstetric unit using 'personal learning logs' stated that more training was required, as well as protected time, and many stated that it did not increase their learning. 10 Some authors question whether the portfolio is too prescriptive, and propose alternative models based on educational development, clinical practice, leadership, innovation, professionalism and personal experience. 11 However, other studies show medical students and registrars in general practice finding portfolios useful.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A study to evaluate a personal learning log (in the form of a portfolio) used by a group of 157 senior house officers in Scotland indicated that the log did not have a significant effect on knowledge or confidence after 6 months and few documented any specific learning. 42 Tigelaar et al 43 from the Netherlands used a qualitative approach, with semi-structured interviews of five medical teachers' views on the use of a portfolio. The results suggested that the portfolio structure was too prescriptive, involved a heavy additional workload and that research was needed on the long-term benefits of using a portfolio.…”
Section: Lack Of Benefit To Practicementioning
confidence: 99%