The Development and piloting of an eHealth breastfeeding resource targeting fathers and partners as co-parents

Abbass‐Dick, Jennifer; Xie, Fangli; Koroluk, Jaymie; Brillinger, Shelley Alcock; Huizinga, Joanne; Newport, Amber; Goodman, William M.; Dennis, Cindy‐Lee

doi:10.1016/j.midw.2017.04.004

Cited by 46 publications

(72 citation statements)

References 28 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Unclassified

Order By: Relevance

“…Considering that statement is over two decades ago, it is evident that the fundamental nature of parenting was a difficult discourse to deconstruct. Although sometimes not possible in single‐parent families, there is hope that this shift towards co‐parenting will be sustained, as its importance is being recognised in health research disciplines to influence a better balance of power (Abbass‐Dick et al., ; Campbell‐Yeo et al., ; Kadivar et al., ; Salonen et al., ).…”

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…Overall there was little to no attention to the Lesbian, Gay, Bisexual, Trans and Queer (LGBTQ+) community from the reviewed articles, except for Abbass‐Dick et al. () who developed additional eHealth resources to better reflect the general population and acknowledged the need to conduct an additional study prioritising diversity among their participants, including same‐sex partners. It was also noted that two articles indirectly demonstrated their support of realities beyond heteronormativity throughout the imagery and language used in their resource.…”

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…Whereby Abbass‐Dick et al. () included an image of their resource with the heading “Father & Partners” (p. 143) and a subsequent photo showing two women and a baby, suggesting a same‐sex partnership. As well as, in their script for the Youtube video promoting parent‐led interventions for pain management in infants, Campbell‐Yeo et al.…”

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…At last, Abbass‐Dick et al. () recognised the homogeneity in their initial study sample and developed different versions of the resources to better present parents from lower economic statuses or cultural groups. Aligning with the philosophical underpinnings of FPS, Bacchus et al.…”

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…Eleven articles were identified in this review, whereby each discussed a parent-targeted perinatal eHealth resource. Of the articles included, five focused on perinatal depression using webbased resources (Baumel & Schueller, 2016;Forsell et al, 2017;Kingston et al, 2017;Logsdon et al, 2013) or a mobile application (Gordon, Henderson, Holmes, Wolters, & Bennett, 2016), three provided web-based education on general infant care (Kadivar, Seyedfatemi, Mokhlesabadi Farahani, Mehran, & Pridham, 2017;Salonen et al, 2011Salonen et al, , 2014, one on web-based breastfeeding education (Abbass-Dick et al, 2017), as well as a mobile application regarding perinatal intimate partner violence (Bacchus et al, 2016) and an educational Youtube video about infant procedural pain (Campbell-Yeo et al, 2017). Only one of the articles was published in 2011 and the remaining within the last 5 years, providing a timely analysis to understand the experiences of eHealth as is currently stands.…”

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 99%

See 4 more Smart Citations

eHealth versus equity: Using a feminist poststructural framework to explore the influence of perinatal eHealth resources on health equity

Richardson

Goldberg

Aston

et al. 2018

Journal of Clinical Nursing

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 99%

See 3 more Smart Citations

eHealth versus equity: Using a feminist poststructural framework to explore the influence of perinatal eHealth resources on health equity

Richardson

Goldberg

Aston

et al. 2018

Journal of Clinical Nursing

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

Clients’ perceptions and experiences of targeted digital communication accessible via mobile devices for reproductive, maternal, newborn, child, and adolescent health: a qualitative evidence synthesis

Ames

Glenton

Lewin

et al. 2019

Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

BackgroundGovernments and health systems are increasingly using mobile devices to communicate with patients and the public. Targeted digital client communication is when the health system transmits information to particular individuals or groups of people, based on their health or demographic status. Common types of targeted client communication are text messages that remind people to go to appointments or take their medicines. Other types include phone calls, interactive voice response, or multimedia messages that offer healthcare information, advice, monitoring, and support.ObjectivesTo explore clients' perceptions and experiences of targeted digital communication via mobile devices on topics related to reproductive, maternal, newborn, child, or adolescent health (RMNCAH).Search methodsWe searched MEDLINE (OvidSP), MEDLINE In‐Process & Other Non‐Indexed Citations (OvidSP), Embase (Ovid), World Health Organization Global Health Library, and POPLINE databases for eligible studies from inception to 3‐6 July 2017 dependant on the database (See appendix 2).Selection criteriaWe included studies that used qualitative methods for data collection and analysis; that explored clients' perceptions and experiences of targeted digital communication via mobile device in the areas of RMNCAH; and were from any setting globally.Data collection and analysisWe used maximum variation purposive sampling for data synthesis, employing a three‐step sampling frame. We conducted a framework thematic analysis using the Supporting the Use of Research Evidence (SURE) framework as our starting point. We assessed our confidence in the findings using the GRADE‐CERQual (Confidence in the Evidence from Reviews of Qualitative research) approach. We used a matrix approach to explore whether potential implementation barriers identified in our synthesis had been addressed in the trials included in the related Cochrane Reviews of effectiveness.Main resultsWe included 35 studies, from a wide range of countries on six continents. Nineteen studies were conducted in low‐ and middle‐income settings and sixteen in high‐income settings. Some of the studies explored the views of people who had experienced the interventions, whereas others were hypothetical in nature, asking what people felt they would like from a digital health intervention. The studies covered a range of digital targeted client communication, for example medication or appointment reminders, prenatal health information, support for smoking cessation while pregnant, or general sexual health information.Our synthesis showed that clients' experiences of these types of programmes were mixed. Some felt that these programmes provided them with feelings of support and connectedness, as they felt that someone was taking the time to send them messages (moderate confidence in the evidence). They also described sharing the messages with their friends and family (moderate confidence).However, clients also pointed to problems when using these programmes. Some clients had poor access to cell networks and t...

show abstract

Patient engagement practice within perinatal eHealth: A scoping review

et al. 2023

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Background There is a gap in knowledge about how perinatal eHealth programs function to support autonomy for new and expectant parents from pursuing wellness goals. Objectives To examine patient engagement (access, personalization, commitment and therapeutic alliance) within the practice of perinatal eHealth. Design Scoping review. Methods Five databases were searched in January 2020 and updated in April 2022. Reports were vetted by three researchers and included if they documented maternity/neonatal programs and utilized World Health Organization (WHO) person‐centred digital health intervention (DHI) categories. Data were charted using a deductive matrix containing WHO DHI categories and patient engagement attributes. A narrative synthesis was conducted utilizing qualitative content analysis. Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta‐Analyses ‘extension for scoping reviews’ guidelines were followed for reporting. Results Twelve eHealth modalities were found across 80 included articles. The analysis yielded two conceptual insights: (1) The nature of perinatal eHealth programs: (1) emergence of a complex structure of practice and (2) practising patient engagement within perinatal eHealth. Conclusion Results will be used to operationalize a model of patient engagement within perinatal eHealth.

show abstract

The Development and piloting of an eHealth breastfeeding resource targeting fathers and partners as co-parents

Cited by 46 publications

References 28 publications

eHealth versus equity: Using a feminist poststructural framework to explore the influence of perinatal eHealth resources on health equity

eHealth versus equity: Using a feminist poststructural framework to explore the influence of perinatal eHealth resources on health equity

Clients’ perceptions and experiences of targeted digital communication accessible via mobile devices for reproductive, maternal, newborn, child, and adolescent health: a qualitative evidence synthesis

Patient engagement practice within perinatal eHealth: A scoping review

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About