The Development and Use of Field Implementation-focused Assessment Method for the Improvement of Quality Management System's Effect

Kim, Jong-Yul; Kang, Chang Wook; Kim, Hong-Je; Kim, Won-Joong; Chung, Youngbae

doi:10.1109/icmit.2006.262322

Cited by 1 publication

(2 citation statements)

References 12 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…Another fact is spoken in professional and scientific circles, yet very “quietly” and more on the conferences than in scientific journals: There is a certain percentage of certified companies which claim to have QMS implemented, while they are only maintaining certificate (Wright, 2000; Kim et al. , 2006; Živaljević et al.…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…Another fact is spoken in professional and scientific circles, yet very "quietly" and more on the conferences than in scientific journals: There is a certain percentage of certified companies which claim to have QMS implemented, while they are only maintaining certificate (Wright, 2000;Kim et al, 2006;Zivaljevi c et al, 2017;Dementyev and Semenov, 2019). This QMS systems cannot have the same characteristics as those with fully implemented and continually improved QMS, therefore benefits and disadvantages of those two kinds of QMS cannot be the same.…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

See 1 more Smart Citation

What would QMS implementation really bring to a company?‐ Theoretical review on benefits and disadvantages researched in practice

Živaljević

Zakić²,

Bevanda³

2022

JOCM

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

PurposeThis study aims to provide information on particular combination of benefits or disadvantages with exact timing of their appearance in the company after its first certification, along with the information on the value range each benefit and disadvantage would take, as well as on the duration period of expected values.Design/methodology/approachSurvey was conducted from October 2015 to January 2019 in 306 certified companies with respondent rate of 58.82%. A questionnaire, structured using literature review to identify all possible benefits and disadvantages of QMS, was used to determine the time of appearance, value range and duration of each identified benefit or disadvantage. Results were used to define indicators for fully applied QMS in each age of its maturity, then the indicators were verified using the records of two ISO certified companies.FindingsThere is a difference in the set of benefits and disadvantages in companies with fully implemented QMS and those that are using QMS only to maintain the certificate. In each age of QMS application a specific set of benefits and disadvantages can be expected as well as the volume range of each of them. These timely sets of benefits and disadvantages can be used as indicators to distinguish well-implemented QMS from those partially implemented.Research limitations/implicationsThe sample consists of companies from Balkan area, therefore economy, politics and culture could have influenced results, predominantly regarding the value ranges of some benefits and disadvantages.Practical implicationsCompanies which already have implemented or are about to implement QMS may use results of the research to plan its effects in years ahead, concerning costs and profit dynamics, as well as to prepare themselves for upcoming probable issues. Auditors can use results in addition to certification criteria to determine the level of QMS implementation and to forecast whether audited company would keep the certificate in the future.Social implicationsSupply chain management could use research findings in selection of chain members to support and speed up third party audits since the benefits and disadvantages of fully implemented QMS are known for each QMS age. This would further imply better structure of supply chains, which would consequently lead to lower production costs, higher quality and competitive prices at the market, which has beneficial implications on the whole society.Originality/valueFor each age of QMS maturity, starting from the first year of certification, expected combination of benefits and disadvantages along with its expected value range and duration are defined. A set of indicators with their expected values.

show abstract

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%