2016
DOI: 10.14697/jkase.2016.36.1.0075
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The Development and Validation of Instrument for Measuring High School Students' STEM Career Motivation

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
7
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

2
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 9 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 28 publications
0
7
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In the literature, there are studies on STEM careers (Holmes et al, 2018;Kiriktas & Sahin, 2019;LaForce et al, 2017;Miller et al, 2018) and scale development and adaptation studies (Kier et al, 2014;Shin et al, 2016;Tyler-Wood et al, 2010). On the other hand, there is a serious paucity of experimental studies on STEM careers.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In the literature, there are studies on STEM careers (Holmes et al, 2018;Kiriktas & Sahin, 2019;LaForce et al, 2017;Miller et al, 2018) and scale development and adaptation studies (Kier et al, 2014;Shin et al, 2016;Tyler-Wood et al, 2010). On the other hand, there is a serious paucity of experimental studies on STEM careers.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…SCCT posits that career development is influenced by continuous interactions between personal cognitive factors (e.g., self-efficacy) and contextual factors (e.g., parental support; Lent, Brown, & Hackett, 1994). In this study, seven constructs of STEM career motivation suggested by Shin, Ha, and Lee (2016) within the SCCT framework were included. Lent et al (1994) proposed that support from the external environment plays a role as a critical regulator in the process of individual career development.…”
Section: Stem Career Motivationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The STEM career motivation (STEM-CM) instrument developed by Shin et al (2016) was used to assess STEM career motivation. It has been previously validated on Korean samples by a combination of IRT-Rasch and Classical Test Theory (CTT; Shin et al, 2016).…”
Section: Instrumentmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations