The development and validation of the Evidence‐Based Practice Questionnaire: Japanese version

Abstract

The Japanese version of the Evidence-Based Practices Questionnaire is a reliable and valid tool and can be used to assess evidence-based practice, attitudes, and research knowledge/skills in Japan.

Implementation outcome instruments for use in physical healthcare settings: a systematic review

“…Fifty-eight manuscripts reported on the measurement properties of 55 implementation outcome instruments, with 65 individual scales. Of the 55 instruments identified, 7 instruments had multiple scales: Evidence-Based Practice Attitude Scale (3 scales: English, Greek and Turkish) [ 33 , 56 , 58 ]; Evidence-Based Practice Questionnaire (3 scales: English, Swedish and Japanese) [ 27 , 28 , 55 ]; Diffusion of Innovation in Long-Term Care (DOI-LTC) measurement battery (2 scales: licensed nurse and certified nursing assistant) [ 38 ]; Mind the Gap Scale (2 scales: parent and adolescent) [ 23 ]; The Attitudes Related to Trauma-Informed Care (3 scales: 45-, 35- and 10-item) [ 35 ]; The Normalisation Measure Development Questionnaire (NoMAD) (2 scales: English and Swedish) [ 76 , 77 ] and a measurement instrument for sustainability of work practices in long-term care (2 scales: 40- and 30-item) [ 78 ].…”

“…2 ). The number of studies assessing implementation outcome measures has increased over time, with one study published in 1998 [ 79 ], through to eight studies published in 2018/2019 [ 27 , 42 , 45 , 49 , 56 , 62 , 76 , 77 ]. Studies were predominantly conducted in high-income countries, with the majority conducted in the USA alone ( n = 22) [ 25 , 29 , 30 , 35 , 37 – 39 , 44 , 46 , 47 , 53 , 57 , 58 , 64 , 66 , 67 ].…”

“…Commonly used terms: satisfaction with various aspects of the innovation (e.g. content, complexity, comfort, delivery and credibility) Shaw et al [ 23 ] The Mind the Gap Scale—adolescent version Excellent Excellent Not assessed Good (22) 7 The Mind the Gap Scale—parent version Excellent Excellent Not assessed Good (27) 7 Dow et al [ 24 ] The Person-Centred Health Care for Older Adults (PCHCOA) Survey Excellent Excellent Not assessed Good (31) 3 Dykes et al [ 25 ] The Impact of Health Information Technology (I-HIT) Scale Excellent Good Not assessed Good (29) 6 Brehaut et al [ 26 ] Ottawa acceptability of decision rules instrument (OADRI) Excellent Poor Not assessed Good (12) 3 Tomotaki et al [ 27 ] Evidence-Based Practice Questionnaire (EBPQ-J)—Japanese version Good Fair Not assessed Good (18) 4 Upton et al [ 28 ] Evidence-Based Practice Questionnaire (EBPQ) Fair Fair Not assessed Good (24) 7 Bhor et Mason [ 29 ] A scale to assess attitudes of healthcare administrators towards the use of e-mail communication between patients and physicians Fair Fair Not assessed Good (20) 4 Phansalkar et al [ 30 ] Instrument for assessing clinicians’ perceptions about use of computerised protocols Fair Fair Not ...…”

Exploring sociodemographic factors related to practice, attitude, knowledge, and skills concerning evidence‐based practice in clinical nursing

“…This study was a cross-sectional survey using secondary data from the validation study of the Evidence-Based Practice Questionnaire, Japanese version (EBPQ-J; Tomotaki, Fukahori, Sakai, & Kurokohchi, 2018).…”

“…The EBPQ-J is the Japanese version of the Evidence-Based Practice Questionnaire (Tomotaki et al, 2018), which Upton and Upton (2006) developed to measure implementation of, attitudes toward, knowledge about, and skills applicable to EBP. The EBPQ, both the original and other language versions, has been used in numerous studies of nurses to evaluate EBP competency among them (Upton, Upton, & Scurlock-Evans, 2014) and is a well-established scale with high reliability and validity (Leung, Trevena, & Waters, 2014).…”