The development, implementation and evaluation of interventions to reduce workplace sitting: a qualitative systematic review and evidence-based operational framework

Abstract

BackgroundProlonged sitting is associated with increased risks of cardiovascular disease, Type 2 diabetes, some cancers, musculoskeletal disorders and premature mortality. Workplaces contribute to a large proportion of daily sitting time, particularly among office-based workers. Interventions to reduce workplace sitting therefore represent important public health initiatives. Previous systematic reviews suggest such interventions can be effective but have reported wide variations. Further, there is uncertainty as to whether effectiveness in controlled trials can be replicated when implemented outside the research setting. The aims of this review are to identify factors important for the implementation of workplace sitting interventions and to translate these findings into a useful operational framework to support the future implementation of such interventions.MethodsA qualitative systematic review was conducted. Four health and social science databases were searched for studies set in the workplace, with office-based employees and with the primary aim of reducing workplace sitting. Extracted data were primarily from author descriptions of interventions and their implementation. Inductive thematic analysis and synthesis was undertaken.ResultsForty studies met the inclusion criteria. Nine descriptive themes were identified from which emerged three higher-order analytical themes, which related to the development, implementation and evaluation of workplace sitting interventions. Key findings included: the importance of grounding interventions in theory; utilising participative approaches during intervention development and implementation; and conducting comprehensive process and outcome evaluations. There was a general under-reporting of information relating to the context within which workplace sitting interventions were implemented, such as details of local organisation processes and structures, as well as the wider political and economic landscape, which if present would aid the translation of knowledge into “real-world” settings.ConclusionsThese findings provided the basis for an operational framework, which is a representation of all nine descriptive themes and three higher-order analytical themes, to support workplace sitting intervention development, implementation and evaluation. Once tested and refined, this framework has the potential to be incorporated into a practical toolkit, which could be used by a range of organisations to develop, implement and evaluate their own interventions to reduce workplace sitting time amongst staff.Electronic supplementary materialThe online version of this article (10.1186/s12889-018-5768-z) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.

Effects of a multicomponent physical activity promoting program on sedentary behavior, physical activity and body measures: a longitudinal study in different office types

“…The development of the PA-promoting program was performed in cooperation with the organization and had a participatory approach, which is recommended to achieve a contextually costumed, anchored, and sustainable intervention (46). Another strength is that the PApromoting program used in this study presumably could easily and at a low cost be used in a wide range of office settings (see supplementary information).…”

Implementing a Physical Activity Promoting Program in a Flex-Office: A Process Evaluation with a Mixed Methods Design

“…As there are variations in workplace context, i.e., in terms of workplace sector, organizational culture and structure, an intervention that has shown to be effective in one context, might not work likewise in another setting. Therefore, there is a need of studies that facilitate the knowledge of how to transfer intervention results to different office settings [13].…”

“…When planning and evaluating interventions aiming to decrease SB in office settings, Mackenzie et al [13] highlight the need of a participatory approach in intervention development and a comprehensive process evaluation (PE) of the intervention. PE studies, preferably with a mixed methods approach, can provide a deeper understanding of facilitating and hindering factors [20,21].…”

“…PE studies, preferably with a mixed methods approach, can provide a deeper understanding of facilitating and hindering factors [20,21]. Detailed contextual descriptions facilitate the interpretation of results which enables the understanding of the link between the intervention activities and intervention outcomes [13,20]. As flex offices are becoming more common, there is a need to further explore and evaluate the effects of interventions aiming to decrease SB and increase PA in this office type.…”

Understanding practitioner perspectives of youth healthcare using thematic and lexical analyses

“…As a form of computer-assisted qualitative data analysis software (CAQDAS), Leximancer offers a systematic, logical and an efficient method to text-mine 50 3. Unlike thematic analysis, [51][52][53] Leximancer can help to reveal and make sense of different findings 54 -given its capacity to offer an "unsupervised" view of the data, 55 it can facilitate "broader opportunities for interrogating the text" 27 When a homeless young person comes in, we need something then and there because they might not come back… So, taking the service to them.…”