2006
DOI: 10.1016/j.agrformet.2006.03.012
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The development of 1901–2000 historical monthly climate models for Canada and the United States

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

8
181
1

Year Published

2011
2011
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 180 publications
(190 citation statements)
references
References 34 publications
8
181
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Inputs include select station data made available from various national climate centres that were interpolated as a function of latitude, longitude and elevation using thin-plate splines (New et al, 1999). Monthly temperature and precipitation using the ANUSPLIN technique exist for Canada and the United States at a resolution of 10 km (McKenney et al, 2006). The input data come from all available climate stations (1901 to 2005) from the National Climatic Data Center in the United States and the Meteorological Service of Canada.…”
Section: B Drought Indicesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Inputs include select station data made available from various national climate centres that were interpolated as a function of latitude, longitude and elevation using thin-plate splines (New et al, 1999). Monthly temperature and precipitation using the ANUSPLIN technique exist for Canada and the United States at a resolution of 10 km (McKenney et al, 2006). The input data come from all available climate stations (1901 to 2005) from the National Climatic Data Center in the United States and the Meteorological Service of Canada.…”
Section: B Drought Indicesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Historical climate station records of monthly mean daily maximum and minimum temperatures and monthly total precipitation were extracted from data covering Canada for the period 1901 to 2010, interpolated to a 10×10 km grid covering the area of Canada on the Lambert Conformal Conic map projection (e.g., McKenney et al 2006a. The spatial coverage of historical climate data for boreal Canada was relatively poor during the first half of the 20 th century ; therefore, only data for 1951 to 2010 were used for the present analysis.…”
Section: Historical Monthly Climate Data 1951 To 2010mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The four GCMs were the medium-resolution Coupled Global Climate Model version 3.1 (CGCM3.1) developed by the Canadian Centre for Climate Modelling and Analysis (e.g., McFarlane et al 2005, Scinocca et al 2008; the Commonwealth Scientific and Industrial Research Organisation (CSIRO) Mk3.5 climate model (CSIRO3.5) (e.g., Gordon et al 2010); the Japanese medium-resolution Model for Interdisciplinary Research on Climate, version 3.2 (MIROC3.2) (e.g., Nozawa et al 2007, Watanabe et al 2008; and the US National Center for Atmospheric Research Community Climate System Model, version 3.0 (NCAR CCSM3.0) (e.g., Gent et al 2011). The downscaling procedure combined the imprecise projections of change derived from each GCM with high-resolution mapping of observed climate data (e.g., McKenney et al 2006a), to allow more detailed assessment of localized changes.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The historical climate data are spatial interpolations of monthly minimums and maximums for temperature ( • C) and precipitation (mm) from 471 meteorological stations across Ontario, eastern Manitoba, and western Quebec, over the period 1901-2000 [32] updated with data from 2001 to 2003.…”
Section: Climate Datamentioning
confidence: 99%