2015
DOI: 10.1016/j.jretconser.2015.03.002
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The development of a consumer value proposition of private label brands and the application thereof in a South African retail context

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

3
62
0
6

Year Published

2015
2015
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
1
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 78 publications
(71 citation statements)
references
References 105 publications
(191 reference statements)
3
62
0
6
Order By: Relevance
“…Davis and Dryer believes that shopping at department store will meet the following values: acquisition, efficiency, aesthetic, exploration, self-gratification, and social interaction caused by display of goods, music, lighting, and beautiful store layouts [29]. While the findings Beneke and Carter, visual merchandising indirect effect on store brand loyalty through customer value [13].…”
Section: B the Impact Of Visual Merchandising On Customer Valuementioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Davis and Dryer believes that shopping at department store will meet the following values: acquisition, efficiency, aesthetic, exploration, self-gratification, and social interaction caused by display of goods, music, lighting, and beautiful store layouts [29]. While the findings Beneke and Carter, visual merchandising indirect effect on store brand loyalty through customer value [13].…”
Section: B the Impact Of Visual Merchandising On Customer Valuementioning
confidence: 99%
“…The results of previous research stated that several factors affecting purchase intention of private label products are using store image, perceived risk, perceived quality, perceived value, trust, and service quality [6][7][8][9][10][11][12][13][14][15][16][17][18].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The findings indicated that consumers' intentions to purchase were determined by the utilitarian attitudes established by the favorable perceptions of the nutritional content and ecological welfare attributes, in addition to the hedonic attitudes formed by the perceptions of the nutritional content, ecological welfare, and sensory appeal attributes. Beneke and Carter (2015) hypothesized that consumers' WTP for private label branded breakfast cereal was influenced by the perceived product value, quality, relative price and risk, in addition to store image, in-store extrinsic cues, familiarity with private label brands and loyalty towards existing national brands, etc. They introduced partial least squares path analysis to test the causal relationships within the hypotheses and the conceptual model.…”
Section: Food Pricing and Consumers' Wtp For Perishable Foodmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Regarding the different levels of food freshness and inventory shortage risk, consumers perceive heterogeneous valuations at different selling periods and generate heterogeneous willingness to pay (WTP) for perishable food (Huang et al, 2011;Herbon, 2013). The line of research on perishable pricing has received a lot of attentions in academic (Dasu and Tong, 2010;Jerath et al, 2010;Ovchinnikov and Milner, 2012;Li et al, 2012;Avinadav et al, 2013;Chung and Li, 2013;Beneke and Carter, 2015). Besides the end-of-period sales pricing tactic adopted by most practical perishable food retailers, researchers have proposed other solutions for perishable pricing.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%