2015
DOI: 10.1016/j.trd.2015.04.023
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The development of a decision making framework for evaluating the trade-off solutions of cleaner seaborne transportation

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
17
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
5
4

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 50 publications
(17 citation statements)
references
References 19 publications
0
17
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Using a subjective generic methodology, Yang et al 15 developed an evaluation model for selecting NO x and SO x emission control solutions. Ölçer and Ballini 16 employed TOPSIS method for the evaluation of the trade-off solutions towards cleaner seaborne transportation. Ren and Lützen 17 presented a generic model which incorporates the fuzzy AHP and VIKOR techniques for the selection of the emissions reduction alternative technologies for ships.…”
Section: Mcdm Methods In the Maritime Research Domainmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Using a subjective generic methodology, Yang et al 15 developed an evaluation model for selecting NO x and SO x emission control solutions. Ölçer and Ballini 16 employed TOPSIS method for the evaluation of the trade-off solutions towards cleaner seaborne transportation. Ren and Lützen 17 presented a generic model which incorporates the fuzzy AHP and VIKOR techniques for the selection of the emissions reduction alternative technologies for ships.…”
Section: Mcdm Methods In the Maritime Research Domainmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Works addressing the challenge of reducing the environmental impact of shipping from a decision-making perspective have appeared at a growing pace in the last decade. Multiple-criteria decision analysis, in general, and the analytical hierarchy process are the most widely used approaches [10][11][12]. The analytical hierarchy process relies on designers' experience with assigning relative weights to decision criteria.…”
Section: Related Work and Backgroundmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Although shipping emissions are regulated nowadays, they are nevertheless estimated to account for 250,000 deaths and 6.4 million asthma cases annually [1]. Due to the pressure to reduce emissions, and the high cost of abatement systems, identifying least-cost strategies for meeting reduction targets has received considerable attention [2][3][4][5][6][7][8][9][10][11][12].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These rankings show that the operational options especially will result in lower emissions and lower costs, whereas the options to be implemented during newbuilding make the lifetime costs of the vessel higher. Other authors (Boulougouris et al, 2011;Chen et al, 2011;Hollenbach and Reinholz, 2011;He and Ikeda, 2013;Ölçer and Ballini, 2015) have looked at how to design the optimal bulker, most of them taking the environmental parameters into account as well. None, however, came up with a bulker design or a list of suitable measures according to their design framework.…”
Section: Eco-bulker Designsmentioning
confidence: 99%