2017
DOI: 10.17239/jowr-2017.09.01.03
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The development of a new instrument to assess metacognitive strategy knowledge about academic writing and its relation to self-regulated writing and writing performance

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
37
0
5

Year Published

2018
2018
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

2
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 30 publications
(42 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
37
0
5
Order By: Relevance
“…The development of the PCK-SRL test builds on rationale scenario-based procedures for measuring metacognitive knowledge of learners (e.g., Karlen, 2017). This test format included textual vignettes of situations (as item stems) that were related to a specific topic, which included several options for action (different approaches/strategies) that varied in their degree of effectiveness or appropriateness for the corresponding scenario (see Figure 3).…”
Section: Pedagogical Content Knowledge About Srlmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The development of the PCK-SRL test builds on rationale scenario-based procedures for measuring metacognitive knowledge of learners (e.g., Karlen, 2017). This test format included textual vignettes of situations (as item stems) that were related to a specific topic, which included several options for action (different approaches/strategies) that varied in their degree of effectiveness or appropriateness for the corresponding scenario (see Figure 3).…”
Section: Pedagogical Content Knowledge About Srlmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Karlen [44] develops a questionnaire on metacognitive strategies, finding a correlation with the scores obtained in the production of a text (writing performance). This same technique is used by Csizér and Tankó [45] to inquire into writing self-regulation and its relationship with the motivational factors of writing.…”
Section: Writing Metacognition At Universitymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The procedure applied for the elaboration of the CM is the discussion group. The procedure followed is the following: (1) the members of the discussion group read and reflect on previous metacognitive writing questionnaires, elaborated by Arroyo and Gutierrez-Braojos, Karlen, and Meneses [44,46,69]; (2) orally, the most appropriate items are discussed and selected to measure writing metasociocognition; (3) with the conclusions of constructing the CM, reformulating and adapting the wording of some items and adding others.…”
Section: Instrumentsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…", recodiert) beinhaltet. Eine konfirmatorische Faktorenanalyse (KFA) mit Mplus (Version 8.1; Muthén & Muthén, 1998-2017 wies zuerst unzufriedene Fit-Werte für ein Modell mit zwei korrelierenden Faktoren erster Ordnung auf. Zudem wies das Item "Von Rückschlägen lasse ich mich nicht entmutigen" schwache Ladungen auf den latenten Faktor Beharrlichkeit auf (dieses Problem zeigte sich auch bei Bowman et al 2015;Muenks et al 2017).…”
Section: Instrumenteunclassified
“…Die Daten wurden anhand deskriptiver Analysen sowie mittels Strukturgleichungsmodellen (SEM) in Mplus 8.1 (Muthén und Muthén 1998-2017 In einem zweiten Schritt wurde die Vorhersagekraft der SRL-Kompetenzen auf die Maturaarbeitsnote untersucht. Hierbei wurden Pfade vom metamotivationalen Wissen auf die motivationalen Regulationsstrategien und die kognitiven Regulationskompetenzen modelliert (beispielhaft in Abb.…”
Section: Statistische Analysenunclassified