2015
DOI: 10.1016/j.socscimed.2015.08.053
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The development of a new condom use expectancy scale for at-risk adults

Abstract: Rationale Engaging in risky sexual behavior increases transmission of HIV. Objective The present study used previously elicited salient outcomes of condom use to examine the factor structure and test the predictive utility of a condom use expectancy scale. Methods Participants were drug offenders from court ordered drug diversion programs in Southern California. The condom use expectancy scale consisted of three factors: positive condom outcome items, negative condom outcome items, and safe sex items. Re… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
3
1

Year Published

2018
2018
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 30 publications
0
3
1
Order By: Relevance
“…However, it also likely restricted the range of between-person differences. Indeed, in the current sample gender, effortful control, and reactivity were not significantly correlated with oral sex, intercourse, or use of protection at the between persons-level, though research suggests that there are significant correlations between both gender and self-control constructs and sexual behavior outcomes (Hahn et al, 2016; Nydegger, Ames, & Stacy, 2015; Simons et al, 2010). Finally, the study did not assess multiple forms of contraception.…”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 69%
“…However, it also likely restricted the range of between-person differences. Indeed, in the current sample gender, effortful control, and reactivity were not significantly correlated with oral sex, intercourse, or use of protection at the between persons-level, though research suggests that there are significant correlations between both gender and self-control constructs and sexual behavior outcomes (Hahn et al, 2016; Nydegger, Ames, & Stacy, 2015; Simons et al, 2010). Finally, the study did not assess multiple forms of contraception.…”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 69%
“…Apart from the regulatory focus in sexuality scale (which was used to categorize participants as pleasure promotion or disease prevention), the data herein reported have not already been published. For the quantitative analyses, we examined regulatory focus differences in the Condom Use Barriers (Crosby et al, 2017) and Condom Use Expectancies scales (Nydegger et al, 2015). As neither of these scales has been used with a Portuguese sample before, we computed an Exploratory Factor Analysis (EFA) with principal axis factoring and promax rotation and examined reliabilities.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In a pre-registered study (OSF), we used different methodologies to tackle the complexities underlying the condom use decision-making process in a sample of Portuguese and Spanish people from a regulatory focus perspective. We used thematic analyses to identify themes and subthemes related to condom use beliefs (Braun & Clarke, 2006) and examined condom use barriers using preexisting instruments (i.e., Condom Use Expectancy and Condom Barriers scales; Crosby et al, 2017;Nydegger et al, 2015). In both analyses, we explored differences by comparing participants more focused on pleasure promotion and those more focused on disease prevention.…”
Section: Current Studymentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation