2015
DOI: 10.1098/rsos.140449
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The development of a segment-based musculoskeletal model of the lower limb: introducing F ree B ody

Abstract: Traditional approaches to the biomechanical analysis of movement are joint-based; that is the mechanics of the body are described in terms of the forces and moments acting at the joints, and that muscular forces are considered to create moments about the joints. We have recently shown that segment-based approaches, where the mechanics of the body are described by considering the effect of the muscle, ligament and joint contact forces on the segments themselves, can also prove insightful. We have also previousl… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

1
69
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

4
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 52 publications
(70 citation statements)
references
References 41 publications
1
69
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The specimens were subjected to a 100 cycle 1 Hz sinusoidally varying loading regime, with an R ‐ratio of 0.1, where the peak load was equal to 1.4 times the body weight of the donor. This loading regime was quantified using a validated model (Freebody version 2) applied to transfemoral amputees . The micromotion was measured from the last 90 cycles of the test and measured per LVDT as the mean difference between the peak and trough micromotion for the 90 cycles.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The specimens were subjected to a 100 cycle 1 Hz sinusoidally varying loading regime, with an R ‐ratio of 0.1, where the peak load was equal to 1.4 times the body weight of the donor. This loading regime was quantified using a validated model (Freebody version 2) applied to transfemoral amputees . The micromotion was measured from the last 90 cycles of the test and measured per LVDT as the mean difference between the peak and trough micromotion for the 90 cycles.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Data filtering was performed in Matlab using a low-pass fourth order Butterworth filter with a cutoff frequency of 10 Hz. Freebody (v2.1)6, an open-source segment-based musculoskeletal model was used for subsequent data processing to determine internal forces. The model’s predictions of tibiofemoral JRF during gait have been validated using data from instrumented prostheses8, and predicted muscle force waveforms have been shown to demonstrate high levels of concordance with known electromyography envelopes6,31.…”
Section: Target Tensors For Neural Network Trainingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Filtering was uniformly applied to kinematic and kinetic data to prevent the introduction of artifacts resulting from incongruences between ground reaction force data and segment accelerations [21]. An open-source musculoskeletal model, Freebody (v1.1) [22], was used for subsequent data processing to determine internal forces. The model’s predictions of tibiofemoral JRF during gait have been validated using data from instrumented prostheses [23], and predicted muscle force waveforms have been shown to demonstrate high levels of concordance with known electromyography envelopes [22, 24].…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…An open-source musculoskeletal model, Freebody (v1.1) [22], was used for subsequent data processing to determine internal forces. The model’s predictions of tibiofemoral JRF during gait have been validated using data from instrumented prostheses [23], and predicted muscle force waveforms have been shown to demonstrate high levels of concordance with known electromyography envelopes [22, 24]. The first part of the operation of Freebody involved the determination of coordinates of internal points (for example, bony landmarks and musculotendinous intersections) in a subject-specific frame of reference.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%