11th Aerodynamic Testing Conference 1980
DOI: 10.2514/6.1980-440
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The development of a self-streamlining flexible walled transonic test section

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
6
0

Year Published

1982
1982
1994
1994

Publication Types

Select...
3
1
1

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 3 publications
0
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…10. The Reynolds number of the experiments reported here was only 0-3xl0 6 , based on wing chord, so it is probable that the separation was laminar.…”
Section: 4mentioning
confidence: 68%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…10. The Reynolds number of the experiments reported here was only 0-3xl0 6 , based on wing chord, so it is probable that the separation was laminar.…”
Section: 4mentioning
confidence: 68%
“…Calculations by Srinivasan and his colleagues are in qualitative agreement with Spivey's* 11 -' 2 ) data. They also report computations of the flow for a half body of revolution tip on a Naca 0015 profile wing of rectangular planform and AR = 5, but at a = 11-8° and Re = 2xl0 6 . However, they do not give any pressure distributions for the tip cap itself.…”
Section: 4mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The same seems to be true of the procedures used at Southampton (Goodyer & Wolf 1982). There the shock waves extended to the wall and, again, were not properly accounted for in the outer-fl ow computation.…”
Section: Tunnels With Deformable Impermeable Wallsmentioning
confidence: 91%
“…14 for the plain-wing configuration. For both configurations, wall pressure coefficient far downstream is given by the expression, derived in Appendix B C Px --(CD -CDV)S/C (9) where CDV is vortex drag coefficient. This coefficient is determined in a way suggested by Maskell (2) and is discussed in more detail below.…”
Section: Combat-aircraft Half-modelmentioning
confidence: 99%