1998
DOI: 10.1016/s0191-8141(98)00039-x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The development of a single cleavage in an area of repeated folding

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

3
8
0

Year Published

2007
2007
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 20 publications
(12 citation statements)
references
References 47 publications
3
8
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Analogous E-W folds in the footwall affect Middle Cambrian to Silurian rocks. Therefore, in this area, no direct evidence exists for a Sardic phase of folding, in agreement with observations of Conti et al (2001) and Lüneburg and Lebit (1998). The possible presence and significance of Middle Ordovician folding event related to the Sardic unconformity remains an open questions, and is beyond the aim of this paper.…”
Section: Kinematic Evolutionsupporting
confidence: 76%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…Analogous E-W folds in the footwall affect Middle Cambrian to Silurian rocks. Therefore, in this area, no direct evidence exists for a Sardic phase of folding, in agreement with observations of Conti et al (2001) and Lüneburg and Lebit (1998). The possible presence and significance of Middle Ordovician folding event related to the Sardic unconformity remains an open questions, and is beyond the aim of this paper.…”
Section: Kinematic Evolutionsupporting
confidence: 76%
“…Brusca and Dessau (1968) similarly recognized an evolution with three main events, but with a different succession: first E-W folds, second N-S folds and third E-W folds again. Recently Lüneburg and Lebit (1998) stated that the Variscan metamorphic foliation cannot be related to a unique folding phase (the second Variscan phase), but the cleavage is the expression of the flattening surface in the strain ellipsoid during a progressive deformation which generated ''E-W'' and then ''N-S'' trending folds, and the same cleavage could be parallel to the axial surfaces of ''E-W'' or ''N-S'' trending folds, or transect them. Thus, cleavage orientation alone cannot be used as a reliable tool to distinguish different deformative phases.…”
Section: Previous Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…In contrast to the above interpretations, other studies emphasized that the correlation of superposed fabrics and inferred succession of deformation phases in multiply deformed regions may be rather problematic in general (e.g., Burg 1999;Luneburg and Lebit 1998;Miller et al 2005;Tobisch and Paterson 1988;Williams 1985). The correlations, which traditionally rely on fabric orientation, styles of superposed folding and outcrop-scale overprinting relationships, assume constant boundary conditions, isotropic materials, and homogeneity and synchroneity of regional deformation.…”
Section: Implications For the Interpretation Of Orogenic Fabrics In Tmentioning
confidence: 99%