This article presents a systematic review of how authenticity is used in science education research and discusses the implications these uses have for the design of science education classroom practices. Authenticity has been discussed in education for decades. However, the authenticity of science education not only concerns the design of educational activities, but also the content of what is being taught. This article reviews research articles published in 2013 and 2014, in the three highest ranking journals in science education, regarding how authenticity is framed in science education. The findings suggest that the uses vary greatly from referring to externally defined practices to student relevance. The findings are discussed with the notions of cultural and personal authenticity to suggest important aspects involved with designing science classroom activities authentic to the different references. Based on the review, we have developed a strategy for balancing authenticity in science education classroom practices between cultural and personal authenticity.PhD Jens Anker-Hansen, former PhD-student at the Department of mathematics and science education at Stockholm University. He currently works at the Swedish national Agency for Education with national tests in the science subjects and computerised testing.PhD Maria Andrée, Associate Professor (Docent) at the Department of mathematics and science education at Stockholm University. Her research focuses on cultural perspectives on science education and conditions for students' participation and learning, particularly in relation to questions of science curriculum, scientific literacy and citizenship.