The development of competency frameworks in healthcare professions: a scoping review

Abstract

BackgroundCompetency frameworks serve various roles including outlining characteristics of a competent workforce, facilitating mobility, and analysing or assessing expertise. Given these roles and their relevance in the health professions, we sought to understand the methods and strategies used in the development of existing competency frameworks. MethodsWe applied the Arksey and O'Malley framework to undertake this scoping review. We searched six electronic databases (MEDLINE, CINAHL, PsycINFO, EMBASE, Scopus, and ERIC) and three grey literature sources (greylit.org, Trove and Google Scholar) using keywords related to competency frameworks. We screened studies for inclusion by title and abstract, and we included studies of any type that described the development of a competency framework in a healthcare profession. Two reviewers independently extracted data including study characteristics. Data synthesis was both quantitative and qualitative. ResultsAmong 5,710 citations, we selected 190 for analysis. The majority of studies were conducted in medicine and nursing professions. Literature reviews and group techniques were conducted in 116 studies each (61%), and 85 (45%) outlined some form of stakeholder deliberation. We observed a significant degree of diversity in methodological strategies, inconsistent adherence to existing guidance on the selection of methods, who was involved, and based on the variation we observed in timeframes, combination, function, application and reporting of methods and strategies, there is no apparent gold standard or standardised approach to competency framework development. ConclusionsWe observed significant variation within the conduct and reporting of the competency framework development process. While some variation can be expected given the differences across and within professions, our results suggest there is some difficulty in determining whether methods were fit-for-purpose, and therefore in making determinations regarding the appropriateness of the development process. This uncertainty may unwillingly create and legitimise uncertain or artificial outcomes. There is a need for improved guidance in the process for developing and reporting competency frameworks.All rights reserved. No reuse allowed without permission. not certified by peer review) is the author/funder, who has granted medRxiv a license to display the preprint in perpetuity.

Substance Use-Related Curriculum for Paramedic Students in British Columbia: A Document Analysis

“…What is included in paramedic education in Canada is an emphasis on linear responsive models that prioritize patient stabilization and transportation in the out-of-hospital setting [14]. The curriculum in general poorly represents complex, contemporary practice, which is a cause for concern, considering the evolving demands of paramedic work, including their involvement in public health crises they weren't best prepared for [15,16].…”

Formulation of Undergraduate Teacher Education Core Competencies: A Harmonization Approach

“…The successful development of competencies drawn from different curriculum sources such as international frameworks, regulatory bodies, industry needs, and relevant theories, has been reported in several studies in many higher education programs (Whitcom, Khan, & White, 2014;Taha, 2015;Leslie, 2016;Ahmadi, Yazdani, Mohammad-Pour, 2017;Sabin, Alrumaih, & Impagliazzo, 2018;Batt, Tavares, & Williams, 2019;Ludwikowska, 2019). Using varied methods, some principles of harmonization have been implicitly used in these studies.…”