2022
DOI: 10.3389/fnins.2022.976767
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The development of cortical processing of speech differs between children with cochlear implants and normal hearing and changes with parental singing

Abstract: ObjectiveThe aim of the present study was to investigate speech processing development in children with normal hearing (NH) and cochlear implants (CI) groups using a multifeature event-related potential (ERP) paradigm. Singing is associated to enhanced attention and speech perception. Therefore, it’s connection to ERPs was investigated in the CI group.MethodsThe paradigm included five change types in a pseudoword: two easy- (duration, gap) and three difficult-to-detect (vowel, pitch, intensity) with CIs. The p… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2024
2024
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
3
2

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 115 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…CI users with prelingual deafness have average discrimination thresholds of 2–3 semitones, in contrast to 0.1–0.2 semitones for the NH peers [ 23 ]. This likely underlies the poorer performance of CI users in melodic contour identification [ 24 ]. Buyens et al concluded that enhancing vocals by 6 dB relative to the background instruments led to greater enjoyment of music by CI users [ 25 ].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…CI users with prelingual deafness have average discrimination thresholds of 2–3 semitones, in contrast to 0.1–0.2 semitones for the NH peers [ 23 ]. This likely underlies the poorer performance of CI users in melodic contour identification [ 24 ]. Buyens et al concluded that enhancing vocals by 6 dB relative to the background instruments led to greater enjoyment of music by CI users [ 25 ].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The previous studies have shown that the P3a can be relatively independent of antecedent negativity. For example, Torppa et al [105] observed in children with cochlear implants and normal hearing smaller MMN but larger P3a in response to speech sounds. Vlaskamp et al [106] found that tone duration deviants induced smaller MMN, but larger P3a in children with ASD.…”
Section: Suppressed Processing Of Vowel Formant Structure Is Associat...mentioning
confidence: 99%