2000
DOI: 10.1016/s0956-5663(99)00061-5
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The development of immunoassays to four biological threat agents in a bidiffractive grating biosensor

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
14
0

Year Published

2005
2005
2015
2015

Publication Types

Select...
5
2

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 62 publications
(14 citation statements)
references
References 13 publications
0
14
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Another approach, an optical based sensor using immunomagnetic separation coupled with electro-chemiluminescence and fluorescence, yielded a significantly reduced detection time of just 30 min (Yu et al 2000). Advances in an alternate technique, rapid chromatograph assays, have brought detection times down even lower, successfully detecting an analyte in just 15 min while also maintaining a high sensitivity (O'Brien et al 2000). Following the development of rapid chromatograph assays, flourescence array biosensensors were shown to detect multiple agents simultaneously with a response time of 14 min, and a fairly low detection limit of only 10 5 colonyforming-units (cfu)/mL (Rowe et al 1999).…”
Section: Biological Sensorsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Another approach, an optical based sensor using immunomagnetic separation coupled with electro-chemiluminescence and fluorescence, yielded a significantly reduced detection time of just 30 min (Yu et al 2000). Advances in an alternate technique, rapid chromatograph assays, have brought detection times down even lower, successfully detecting an analyte in just 15 min while also maintaining a high sensitivity (O'Brien et al 2000). Following the development of rapid chromatograph assays, flourescence array biosensensors were shown to detect multiple agents simultaneously with a response time of 14 min, and a fairly low detection limit of only 10 5 colonyforming-units (cfu)/mL (Rowe et al 1999).…”
Section: Biological Sensorsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…BTAs, which include bacteria, fungi, and viruses, remain a serious threat to both civilian and military populations (O'Brien et al 2000). A small UAS that could detect BTAs in near-real-time would have a number of potential applications.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Most of them detect BoNT in the ng/mL-range (Ogert et al 1992;Shriver-Lake et al 1993;Kumar et al 1994;O'Brien et al 2000;Varnum et al 2006;Grate et al 2009;Ren and Pearton 2012). Only few of them have been tested with complex matrices like food, clinical, or environmental samples (Ganapathy et al 2008;Weingart et al 2012).…”
Section: Rapid Detection Tools Based On Elisa Formatsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…not containing the analyte of interest) can be processed without the need for regenerating the detection chemistry or changing the sensor configuration. (2) Following analyte detection, the sensor can usually be reset by removing the target analyte with a low pH wash step [12][13][14]. (3) SPR sensors are universal detectors, since they can detect both BW and CW agents with the same instrument.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…(3) SPR sensors are universal detectors, since they can detect both BW and CW agents with the same instrument. (4) Direct detection with SPR sensors does not continuously consume reagents, unlike the majority of other detection procedures, such as enzyme linked imunosorbent assays (ELISA) [15][16][17][18], light addressable potentiometric sensors (LAPS) [19][20][21], array biosensors [17,22,23], immunomagnetic separation coupled with electro-chemiluminescence and fluorescence procedures (IMS-ECL and IMS-FCL) [18,[24][25][26] or rapid chromatographic assays (RCA) [14], all of which require the additional analytes used in sandwich assays. In addition to a direct detection mode, SPR biosensors can also work in an amplification mode to further lower the detection limit.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%