2019
DOI: 10.29333/iji.2019.12326a
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The Development of Instrument for Assessing Students’ Affective Domain Using Self- and Peer-Assessment Models

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
14
0
2

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 24 publications
(21 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
14
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…However, as it only examines the classic children games from a particular culture in Indonesia and merely focuses on youth character development without considering other potential factors, the future research should carefully investigate the roles of traditional games with their local wisdom in improving other learning skills and specific characters of exceptional learners across ages. Later, to assess the students' character values, self-and peer-assessment as well as other methods can be applied comprehensively, for example by using the model suggested by Setiawan, Mardapi, Supriyoko & Andrian, (2019) who successfully develop 12 indicators and 24 items constructed based on SA model for assessing students' affective domain.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, as it only examines the classic children games from a particular culture in Indonesia and merely focuses on youth character development without considering other potential factors, the future research should carefully investigate the roles of traditional games with their local wisdom in improving other learning skills and specific characters of exceptional learners across ages. Later, to assess the students' character values, self-and peer-assessment as well as other methods can be applied comprehensively, for example by using the model suggested by Setiawan, Mardapi, Supriyoko & Andrian, (2019) who successfully develop 12 indicators and 24 items constructed based on SA model for assessing students' affective domain.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In other words, the Cronbach's Alpha correlation coefficient values above are not sufficient for a reliability. The minimum reliability coefficient is 0.70 to indicate the correct reliability (Scholtes et al, 2011;Setiawan & Mardapi, 2019). Another opinion states that the results of the calculation of high Cronbach's Alpha coefficients do not guarantee the reliability of an instrument (Adams & Wieman, 2011).…”
Section: Instrument Pilot Testingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…thinking ability test will increase to 0.708 (see Table 10). That is, the reliability coefficient is satisfactory because it is above a predetermined limit (see opinion Scholtes et al, 2011;Setiawan & Mardapi, 2019). One effort to improve test reliability scores is to write tests clearly and make test instructions easy to understand (Drost, 2011).…”
Section: Instrument Pilot Testingmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The items validity can be seen from the loading factor for each item with the loading factor value 0.3. Therefore, the item is considered to be valid (Setiawan et al, 2019;Setiawan & Suardiman, 2018). Table 3 shows 18 items have a loading factor score of more than 0.3, meaning that there are 18 valid items (all items) on the OA instrument.…”
Section: Construct Validity and Reliability On Extended Trial Testmentioning
confidence: 99%