The development of market orientation: a consideration of institutional influence in China

Abstract

Purpose-China has followed an unique transition from central planning to a market economy. The purpose of this paper is to examine how China's unique blend of capitalism and socialism has influenced Chinese firms" market orientation. Design/methodology/approach-Broadly speaking this paper's methodological approach can be described as a positivistic epistemology. Findings-The paper provides insights into how Chinese institutions facilitate or hinder firms" market orientation practices through direct effect, externality effect and indirect causal chains. The central theme is that, compared with other countries, China's unaltered political institutions and newly created market institutions have led to unique roles of coercive, normative and mimetic pressures in the diffusion of market orientation among Chinese firms. Especially, regulative institutions" influence on other institutions is more salient in China than in many other countries. Research limitations/implications-A lack of primary data and empirical documentation and a lack of in-depth treatment of some of the key issues are major limitations here. Practical implications-The paper analyses institutional pressures facing firms operating in China and their variation across different types of firms. An understanding of these pressures is essential to devise marketoriented approaches in the country. It also examines different institutional factors (e.g. Chinese professional associations) that influence a firm's capability to implement market-oriented practices. Originality/value-This paper's greatest value stems from the fact that it employs institutional theory as a lens to understand firms" market orientation. The institutions-market orientation nexus is a very important but highly underexamined subject.

The Impact of Coercive Pressures on Sustainability Practices of Small Businesses in South Africa

“…The institutional theory espouses that organisations of all classes modify configurations consistent with the presence and setup of organisations in their proximity and location [28]. Under institutional isomorphism [29], a firm primarily experiences coercive pressures wielded by other firms which it is subjective to for its continual existence [30,31]. Coercive isomorphism emanates from compelling pressures that are either formal or informal [28].…”

The Role of Mimicry Isomorphism in Sustainable Development Operationalisation by SMEs in South Africa

“…Imitation for legitimation will only transpire if the imitated organisations are perceived to be significantly successful in line with the espoused values within the field [19]. Firms will mimic other organisations that fall within their industry [23]. However, the firms being imitated should be identical in complexity or the ones on the cutting edge.…”

Motives underlying the choice of business majors: A multi-country comparison

“…Aside, the lower importance attributed to career outputs for Chinese majors might reflect lower career expectations than for UAE, with the institutional structures of state intervention and limit on social mobility playing an influential role on culture, supporting institutional theory. Despite China's transition toward global competitiveness supported by foreign direct investment, the state's continued control over the economy, including bureaucratic regulations, can restrict enterprise (Kshetri, 2009 The complexity of motives, across cultures would suggest that educational administrators embarking on expansion programs abroad should thoroughly research their markets prior to investment. Domestic programs will have to be modified in some aspects.…”